View Single Post
Old 01-29-2013, 10:24 PM
Marie33's Avatar
Marie33 Marie33 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 180
10 yr Member
Marie33 Marie33 is offline
Member
Marie33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 180
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glenntaj View Post
here's what my first skin biopsy report said (without the extraneous stuff about how the sample was collected):

Epidermal nerve fibers per millimeter:

Thigh Mean 4.7
Range 3.0-7.7
Reference Values: 21.1 +/- 10.4; range 2.9--57.5
Fifth percentile value 5.2

Leg Mean 3.2
Range 1.3-4.3
Reference Values: 13.8 +/- 5.6; range 0.6--32.2
Fifth percentile value 3.8

The reference values indicate the mean in the tested reference group, which presumably included normals and people suffering from small-fiber syndromes normals (first number), then the standard deviation in that group (the +/- number), then the total range across everyone. These are known as the McArthur protocols. The fifth percentile values are then given, and as you can see, my means are both below that value, so by protocol definition, I have "abnormal intraepidermal nerve fiber density, consistent with a small fiber neuropathy". The report also states "the nerve fibers within the thigh suggest excessive branching, also consistent with a small-fiber neuropathy".

In my most recent skin biopsy, my thigh mean comes back at 9.5, and my leg mean comes back 5.8, which they tell me averages out at about the 18th percentile. This was almost two years ago--it's possible I would show even more re-enervation now, but who knows at what figures I "began".
Hi glenn,
Are those reference values still valid? The reference values shown on my skin biopsy were different. (Done Oct 2012) Could they have changed the protocals? Using your reference values for my skin biopsy I would have been in the normal range. What lab did your tests? Mine were done by Therapath.
Pardon my ignorance but what do you mean by "re-enervation"? Your most recent report shows higher numbers. Doesn't that mean improvement.
As usual Thank you for your help.
Marie33 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote