Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-29-2013, 10:24 PM #20
Marie33's Avatar
Marie33 Marie33 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 180
10 yr Member
Marie33 Marie33 is offline
Member
Marie33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 180
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glenntaj View Post
here's what my first skin biopsy report said (without the extraneous stuff about how the sample was collected):

Epidermal nerve fibers per millimeter:

Thigh Mean 4.7
Range 3.0-7.7
Reference Values: 21.1 +/- 10.4; range 2.9--57.5
Fifth percentile value 5.2

Leg Mean 3.2
Range 1.3-4.3
Reference Values: 13.8 +/- 5.6; range 0.6--32.2
Fifth percentile value 3.8

The reference values indicate the mean in the tested reference group, which presumably included normals and people suffering from small-fiber syndromes normals (first number), then the standard deviation in that group (the +/- number), then the total range across everyone. These are known as the McArthur protocols. The fifth percentile values are then given, and as you can see, my means are both below that value, so by protocol definition, I have "abnormal intraepidermal nerve fiber density, consistent with a small fiber neuropathy". The report also states "the nerve fibers within the thigh suggest excessive branching, also consistent with a small-fiber neuropathy".

In my most recent skin biopsy, my thigh mean comes back at 9.5, and my leg mean comes back 5.8, which they tell me averages out at about the 18th percentile. This was almost two years ago--it's possible I would show even more re-enervation now, but who knows at what figures I "began".
Hi glenn,
Are those reference values still valid? The reference values shown on my skin biopsy were different. (Done Oct 2012) Could they have changed the protocals? Using your reference values for my skin biopsy I would have been in the normal range. What lab did your tests? Mine were done by Therapath.
Pardon my ignorance but what do you mean by "re-enervation"? Your most recent report shows higher numbers. Doesn't that mean improvement.
As usual Thank you for your help.
Marie33 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If skin Biopsy and Emg are negative....... invisable Peripheral Neuropathy 17 04-05-2021 02:32 AM
Skin biopsy result Tulips Peripheral Neuropathy 13 10-21-2010 04:40 PM
Skin Biopsy Negative sbvcrn Peripheral Neuropathy 6 11-19-2008 09:20 AM
My skin biopsy was negative lailavia Peripheral Neuropathy 16 11-11-2007 03:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.