FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Chronic Pain Whatever the cause, support for managing long term or intractable pain. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-20-2007, 01:07 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
New York Times, TierneyLab
April 19, 2007, 8:26 am Judge Dismisses the Most Serious Charges Against Dr. Hurwitz By John Tierney ALEXANDRIA, Va. — His retrial in federal court here isn’t over yet, but Dr. William E. Hurwitz is already doing much better than he did the first time. Judge Leonie M. Brinkema has dismissed the most serious charges against him. Dr. Hurwitz, whom I wrote about in a recent column, is the most prominent of the doctors who have been prosecuted for writing prescriptions for OxyContin and other painkillers. In 2004, he was convicted of drug trafficking and, most significantly, of writing prescriptions that led to bodily injury and deaths, crimes that carried a mandatory minimum sentence of 20 years. He was sentenced to 25 years and has been in prison for more than two years. The verdict was overturned on appeal, leading to a retrial that has been going on for nearly four weeks. On Wednesday afternoon, after the defense rested its case, the judge granted the defense’s request to dismiss the charges of causing bodily injury or death. Dr. Hurwitz still faces more than three dozen counts of illlegally distributing narcotics and participating in a criminal conspiracy, but these lesser offenses do not carry mandatory minimum sentences. In dismissing the charges, the judge cited two arguments made by the defense. One was that the prosecution had not proved that the painkillers prescribed by Dr. Hurwitz caused injury and death. The other argument relied on a Supreme Court decision last year that federal narcotics laws did not give the Justice Department the power “to define general standards of medical practice” — which is what federal prosecutors had effectively been trying to do in the cases of Dr. Hurwitz and other doctors. The prosecutors had argued that a doctor could be a drug trafficker even if he didn’t know the drugs he prescribed were being resold, and even if the drugs weren’t actually being resold. A doctor was supposedly violating federal law simply by issuing a prescription that was outside the bounds of “medical practice.” Because of this interpretation, trials of Dr. Hurwitz and other doctors turned into debates over whether their prescribed doses of Oxycontin and other opioids were medically appropriate for the patients. But the Supreme Court, in its Gonzales v. Oregon decision last year, reaffirmed the states’ responsibility to set medical standards and ruled that federal law merely ‘’bars doctors from using their prescription-writing powers as a means to engage in illicit drug dealing and trafficking as conventionally understood.'’ Dr. Hurwitz could still be convicted of drug trafficking if the jury decides that he knowingly and intentionally prescribed drugs to be resold or misused. He denied doing so; prosecutors argued that some of his patients were such blatant dealers and addicts that he must have known what they were doing. But those dealers and addicts were not the patients whose injuries and deaths were the basis of the prosecution’s most serious charges against Dr. Hurwitz. The defense successfully argued that he had no reason to suspect that these patients would peddle or misuse the drugs he prescribed, and therefore, according to the Supreme Court’s decision, there were no grounds for charging him with violating federal drug laws. As the jury contemplates the remaining charges against Dr. Hurwitz, here’s a question for lawyers, doctors and patients: What does the dismissal of the serious charges against Dr. Hurwitz mean for other doctors accused of violating federal prosecutors’ idea of proper medicine? http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/ |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-22-2007, 11:34 PM | #2 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
Dr. Hurwitz saved my life!! He was my doctor! I live in the mid-west. The first time I saw him, he made me stay in DC for two weeks. He was the only doctor who was truly trying to find my pain levels. Dr. Hurwitz would tell me and my wife to walk the Mall, push the pain to the max then come back that day. He cleared me of all my meds and started me on LOW dose Methadone. The next day, I would go walk until I could go no more, at that point he told me to take the methadone until the pain subsided, then continue walking. He found my pain thresh-hold. No one else had.. He got me OFF the MS-Cotin, OFF the Oxycodon. And a mryiad off other crap.
I have nothing but the upmost respect for him, I'm drug free now, if it was'nt for him; I would not be here. I have full blown RSD.. I know pain.. This is why docs are afraid to write scripts, DEA always watching. But you can bet your butt that if it was one of them, or family member they would do the samething trying to get relief. I'm sorry but if people would take the meds on the label, and do it correctly, instead of trying to get wasted this would not be a matter. Has for has over prescribing; you know as well as I. You can get anything you want on the street.. There just trying to make an example out of these doctors.. This hole thing makes me sick... Last edited by sadlyme; 04-23-2007 at 05:31 AM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
04-23-2007, 02:12 AM | #3 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
Doctors are trained to treat patients, not to be detectives,” says Dr. James N. Campbell, a Johns Hopkins University neurosurgeon specializing in pain, who will be another witness for Dr. Hurwitz. He says that doctors have already reacted to the D.E.A. crackdown by changing the way they deal with the many Americans — at least 50 million, by several estimates — who suffer from chronic pain.
“Opioids were a revolution in pain treatment during the 1990s, but doctors are now more reluctant to use them,” Dr. Campbell says. “If a doctor perceives there’s a 1 in 5,000 chance that a prescription will lead to a D.E.A. inquiry — just an inquiry, not even an arrest — he’s not going to take the chance. So the victims are the patients.” Sphere: Related Blogs & Articles More Articles in Science » Need to know more? 50% off home delivery of The Times. what's this? Pain&Chemical Dependency 7th International Conference New York June 21 - 24, 2007 iapcd.com PRN Learn about the Justice Department's war on pain management www.painreliefnetwork.org Oregon Board Disciplines Doctor for Not Treating Patients' Pain (September 4, 1999)
More Articles in Science » var bnum=new Number(Math.floor(99999999 * Math.random())+1); document.write(''); |
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current legislation that could apply to us | Parkinson's Disease | |||
Drug companies cannot afford current methods | Parkinson's Disease | |||
ALS current Clinical Trials list | ALS | |||
Government-funded report dismisses idea of Gulf War syndrome | ALS News & Research |