[swift]

Originally Posted by KTM5665

I was just curious as to how, from the list of volunteers...some of them were picked. I recognize a couple of names that may cause potential , well...upheavel from various other forums round the net~

I'm trying not to think about that one.

[Doody]

Lord love a duck. I'm glad I'm not Doc John. I'd come back here and just say, forgit about it.

I see complaints about a thread of complaints based on other complaints in other threads that had complaints about a comlplaint that so and so made in another........

What I saw was people verging on taking away a fundamental right to express ourselves.

So and so doesn't like chocolate, someone doesn't like angels, I personally don't like religion shoved down my throat, but what are we gonna do? I wouldn't believe it if someone here told me that nothing would offend them.

Where do we draw the line? No talk about chocolates?

Do I not get to put a link to Race for the Cure in my signature line because someone in the Breast Cancer forum may become upset?

Can I not go into a colon cancer forum and speak of my issues because someone might become offended when I start describing problems related to a colonoscopy? Or want to put a link in my signature to some site for a Cure for Colon Cancer?

If I'm sick of watching someone consistently using bad grammar because it so offends me, that person can be asked to have their posts checked first because I become so upset at reading them?

Where do we draw the line? How about we let the chocolate and the angels and bad grammar stay, and start freaking out when we have to question the use of someone's pornographic avatar?

And, I did see bashing in that thread (indirectly). I'm not agreeing with it being locked but...when people were complaining about other people posting about 'chocolate', who do you think of?????????? Or 'hugs' and 'kisses' or whatever the other complaint was

If we had a Moderator Number Four here, we wouldn't be dealing with all of this.

Now there's a scary thought.