FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Community & Forum Feedback Discuss ideas and offer feedback about our community here. It's a also a place to ask any questions you may have about the community itself. Our Community Guidelines. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | ||
|
|||
Legendary
|
me again. I keep thinking about this. I'm not arguing, I'm just trying to understand the logic of doing it this way as well as the effects it might have on people posting.
Wouldn't it be more logical to give a warning to the couple of people who _are_ abusing the edit feature and leave everything as it is? Surely that would be less time consuming in the long run? I'm fully aware that we can post to a Moderator to have our posts changed, because people keep saying that, but that isn't the point to me. The point is that all the other 99% of users who are doing the right thing have no control over their words because of a tiny minority. moot point I suppose. I guess nobody read my message about how my edit feature was still working yesterday... Last edited by Lara; 03-12-2007 at 03:26 PM. Reason: test: last edit 6.25am, 13th - orig. post 5.52am 12th - Aust. time |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Editing Thread titles | Computers and Technology | |||
Time Limit for Editing and Deleting Your Posts? | Community & Forum Feedback | |||
Please vote in FF about editing options | Bipolar Disorder | |||
Tysabri's Use for MS Limited for now. | Multiple Sclerosis |