Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-02-2008, 03:41 PM #6
Jamesnns's Avatar
Jamesnns Jamesnns is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 42
15 yr Member
Jamesnns Jamesnns is offline
Junior Member
Jamesnns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 42
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Av8rgirl View Post
Gee James, I didn't mean to post this to cause such an angry response.

This is not a cure...just another tool in the choice tool box.
So sorry, I didn't mean to come across as angry at all. In fact, just the opposite. I'm all for new improved treatments. It's just that I don't like the Pharm companies much. I realize they need large amounts of money to continue research, but at the same time I'm tired of the huge costs to those of us who need these drugs when we know as fact that we could get them outside the USA for a lot less. Mix in the fact that many who are stuck in the middle have zero access to them too (if your insured, good. If your on welfare, good. If your the working poor, your screwed)

I do wonder, if and when they come out with a drug that will at least halt the progression of MS completely how much this drug(s) will cost. One year of an ABC runs about $15,000 or more. So what would an average Joe like me have to pay for it (cure)? It's a very sad fact that I, and many, many like me will have to live the rest of our lives with MS simply because we cannot afford the drug(s).

I also can't help thinking that just one person on a ABC is spending $15,000 a year, and that if that person were to take a drug that would permanately halt MS, the drug company is out the $15K for the rest of that persons life???
Times this by hundreds of thousands of people, and were talking Billions of dollars lost to the Pharms.

I wonder how much money the Pharms' spend on TV advertizing trying to convince us to take this pill or that pill (ED as an example..Don't forget to ask your Doctor about...?). I can't help but think that the money could be used more effectively.

Sorry if you thought I replied as angry, I'm not really. I consider myself a logical person and I try not to let emotions outweigh facts.
__________________
Occam's Razor

.
Jamesnns is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
Lady (02-20-2009), tovaxin_lab_rat (02-04-2008)
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pipeline Insight: Orphan Diseases in CNS - Part II: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis BobbyB ALS News & Research 0 01-19-2008 10:01 AM
Parkinson Pipeline Project...survery results Stitcher Parkinson's Disease 1 09-09-2007 03:02 PM
Parkinson Pipeline Database paula_w Parkinson's Disease 2 01-18-2007 07:56 AM
Als Clinical Trials: State Of The Pipeline Agios ALS 0 12-14-2006 02:34 PM
Safinamide in the Pipeline: triple action ZucchiniFlower Parkinson's Disease 1 10-18-2006 12:45 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.