Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-27-2006, 09:32 AM #14
Harry Z Harry Z is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London, Canada
Posts: 241
15 yr Member
Harry Z Harry Z is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London, Canada
Posts: 241
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kingrex View Post
Same thing with Crestor and Coreg - both of which I take. There is no long-term data because they're new. Still, we actually DO know what Tysabri, Crestor and Coreg will do - they will all improve the lives of those who take them.
Does that statement mean that by taking Tysabri for your MS, there is a guarantee that it will help you?

Quote:
There are now 4,500 patients enrolled in TOUCH, and 1,700 have received at least one infusion. As we get into calendar year 2007, the perceived odds of contracting PML (based upon the 3 deaths which occurred before the combo-effect was identified) will have dropped significantly.
Another "perceived" guarantee?

Quote:
IMO, patients should be allowed to evaluate the risks themselves. Those who, for whatever reason, would like to see Tysabri fail will predictably capitalize upon the "uncertainty" angle. Those with a real choice to make will look at tangible evidence, and they'll evaluate their own status with regard to the risk of an alternative (and less effective) treatment. Then they will make a choice, with only their own circumstances in mind...and that, IMO, is how it should be.
I totally agree with you in that most MS patients will make their own choice based on what they know about Tysabri or any medication. I can't imagine, though, that ANY reader here or any MS forum would like to see Tysabri fail miserably because that would only create far more suffering for the patient. And MS patients suffer enough on any one given day.

Quote:
A lot of people thought going to the moon was too dangerous. Others determined that the risks were manageable and that they could be overcome. Three guys died early on in the program, and as with Tysabri, the program was stopped while NASA determined what measures needed to be instituted, in order to make the capsule safe. NASA then resumed the program - and the rest is history.
I somehow think the NASA engineers had a better idea and handle on the risks than what the docs have on Tysabri at the moment.

Harry
Harry Z is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who at Braintalk is on Tysabri? BBS1951 Multiple Sclerosis 26 10-21-2006 09:41 PM
More Tysabri News pantos Multiple Sclerosis 0 10-06-2006 08:52 PM
health canada approves tysabri dayle Multiple Sclerosis 12 10-06-2006 12:29 PM
New Tysabri results from Ectrims wannabe Multiple Sclerosis 8 10-05-2006 12:59 AM
Tysabri info from ECTRIMS mexigrl Multiple Sclerosis 9 10-02-2006 12:05 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.