Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-15-2008, 09:23 PM #6
jackD's Avatar
jackD jackD is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maryland outside WASH DC
Posts: 258
15 yr Member
jackD jackD is offline
Member
jackD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maryland outside WASH DC
Posts: 258
15 yr Member
Default Comparison of multiple sclerosis lesions at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla

The 21% increase in lesions found using a 3.0 tesla MRI indicate that lots of small lesions cannot be found with the more common 1.5 Tesla MRI.

JackD



1: Invest Radiol. 2003 Jul;38(7):423-7.

Comparison of multiple sclerosis lesions at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla.

Sicotte NL, Voskuhl RR, Bouvier S, Klutch R, Cohen MS, Mazziotta JC.

Department of Neurology, Division of Brain Mapping, University of California Los
Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative sensitivity of MR scanning for multiple
sclerosis (MS) at 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0 T using identical acquisition
conditions, as is typical of multicenter clinical trials. METHODS: Twenty-five
subjects with MS were scanned at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using fast spin echo, and
T(1)-weighted SPGR with and without gadolinium contrast injections. Image data,
blinded to field strength, were analyzed using automated segmentation and lesion
counting.

RESULTS: Relative to scanning at 1.5 T, the 3.0 T scans showed a 21%
increase in the number of detected contrast enhancing lesions, a 30% increase in
enhancing lesion volume and a 10% increase in total lesion volume.

DISCUSSION:
The improved detection ability using high-field MR imaging is prominent even
when sequence parameters are optimized around the midfield units. Multicenter
trials using both 1.5 T and 3.0 T instruments may be affected by these
sensitivity differences.

PMID: 12821856 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
jackD is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
hollym (10-16-2008)
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about quality & value of supplements aquario Parkinson's Disease 9 10-16-2008 08:19 PM
Quality contol for Copax! jmiller Multiple Sclerosis 12 03-07-2008 08:45 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.