Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-31-2009, 01:01 PM #16
lady_express_44's Avatar
lady_express_44 lady_express_44 is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,300
15 yr Member
lady_express_44 lady_express_44 is offline
Grand Magnate
lady_express_44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,300
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by notasperfectasyou View Post
Cherie,

You really hit on a lot in a little bit of words, I need to learn to do that.

I boil down many of the thoughts -
1) Does a cure require having the ability to prevent/vaccinate others not yet diagnosed?
2) Does a cure mean you must have a ready antidote for someone after the diagnosis?
3) Does a cure mean you are returned to your pre-illness state or is it acceptable if there is irreparable damage left behind?
4) What if the damage is significant?
5) Is the cessation of progression enough to call a treatment a cure?

Too bad you can't set up a poll on this website. Thank you Cherie for your thoughts. I wonder how each of us has a different experience that effects the degree of change we would require of something called a care. Ken
Yeah, but look how many questions those few words generated for you?

I would love (and prefer ) if they could come out with a vaccine, like we have for measles ... but I'm not going to be holding my breath for that ...

If not that, maybe an anicdote ... but not one that just takes care of the immediate problem (attack/flare). A cure to me would be that it stops the disease in it's tracks, whenever MS is discovered. So, it would NOT be like insulin for diabetes (which means the underlying disease still exists, but it is hopefully "managed" to some degree). The reason I don't like that option is because we all know that it is next to impossible to assess whether these treatments are working to any degree for sometimes many, many years ... I want it to STOP, no if's, and's or but's!!

I wish there would be no damage to contend with after the first event, and if they were able to stop MS in it's tracks immediately after dx, in most cases there wouldn't be. However, for those of us who have had it for years, I think it is unrealistic to think that our nerves could regenerate to pre-MS standards.

For me, the ceasation of progression is a cure. For those who are just starting out with MS, that would mean they didn't accumulate any/much anyway, so that would also be a cure.

We can do poll's on here, Ken. I am going on memory, but I think the option is at the bottom of the screen when you start a new thread.

Cherie
__________________
I am not a Neurologist, Physician, Nurse, or Hairdresser ... but I have learned that it is not such a great idea to give oneself a haircut after three margaritas
.
lady_express_44 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
tkrik (09-03-2009)
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.