Myasthenia Gravis For support and discussions on Myasthenia Gravis, Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes and LEMS.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-18-2013, 04:45 AM #6
alice md's Avatar
alice md alice md is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 884
15 yr Member
alice md alice md is offline
Member
alice md's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 884
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnnieB3 View Post
Am I responsible for this quandry? I questioned whether you had fatigable weakness that was demonstrated by a clinical exam - which obviously you have had. And your SFEMG demonstrates that as well.

What I was trying to point out in my other post was that MG has weakness that clearly fatigues upon exertion or repetitive activity. Like Alice said, paraphrasingly, "Do this, that happens."

I asked the question because you can have muscle weakness from a fluctuating thyroid condition or electrolytes being off but it won't specifically be related to an activity. I certainly didn't ask in order to make you doubt the basics.

It's possible for you to have BOTH.

With MG, however, you have to see it in "action" in order to know how it is behaving. Like Alice said too, just sitting in an exam room might not show a doctor how weak you are. Except for that time you pushed for a longer period of time and got weaker. The best neuros put a suspected MG patient through a veritable workout.

I'm sorry if I added to your questions instead of helping.

Annie
Annie,

I personally think what you did is great. When trying to understand you have to ask questions and those lead to further questions and brain storming.
It obviously create an uneasy feeling (because we all feel better walking on solid ground) but this is the way we learn and gain a better and more solid understanding eventually.

I can fully understand Abby's concerns. I know that I stopped worrying about what my illness is (autoimmune or congenital) only after I decided (together with my neurologist) that it is not going to make any difference with regards to management of my illness. And also knowing that with the currently available tools I will probably not be able to get a clear answer any how.

Admittedly, having MuSK antibodies (even if those were not detected with the usual tests) and gradually learning that although my illness is not "classical MG" it is quite classical MuSK MG did make things somewhat easier for me. (it did not make my illness any "nicer" but it did help me feel more comfortable about it and knowing what to expect/hoping for better treatments which will be developed eventually etc.).

I keep on saying that the name of the illness doesn't really matter. But, it reality this is not entirely so. We live in a world of names and titles and life is easier with them. Furthermore, if is quite understandable that if you take treatment (with potential side effects) you want to know it is justified.

Abby,

I do hope you will eventually find better answers that will put you at ease. Sometimes you need time and patience, until the right test is developed or more experience is gained with your type of illness. (mostly if it is very rare).

Practically, Clearly you do not have classical AchR MG, and you also don't seem to be typical MuSK MG. But, there are still antibodies which may be found in the future so autoimmune MG is a viable possibility.

You seem to have a good response to immunomodulatory treatment (even if you are not among those who are fortunate enough to have a full remission) and also have other autoimmune disease (and a family history), which makes it more likely that you have another autoimmune and not a congenital disease. So, I think that at this point you should be content with that. (even if it is not perfect).

It is good to always keep in the back of your mind other options, but don't drive yourself crazy about it.

It also sounds that you have a good, sensible and caring neurologist you can discuss things with.

I personally think that it is more likely that an elderly aunt had a minor stroke than suddenly developed minor signs of congenital myasthenia.
If fact, my neurological told me that even in an elderly patient with known MS they would first think of a stroke, if he/she suddenly presents with an acute event during a stable period.
alice md is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
AnnieB3 (01-19-2013), Stellatum (01-18-2013)
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weakness RavenC Myasthenia Gravis 12 08-01-2012 06:15 AM
Arm weakness betsilini58 New Member Introductions 4 03-11-2012 04:41 PM
Leg Weakness firebird1979 Neuromuscular 3 09-23-2011 01:33 PM
Fluctuating Blood pressure and mg LindaR Myasthenia Gravis 11 12-14-2010 03:47 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.