Parkinson's Disease Tulip


advertisement
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-26-2010, 12:28 PM #1
lurkingforacure lurkingforacure is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,485
15 yr Member
lurkingforacure lurkingforacure is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,485
15 yr Member
Default Two neuros, two completely different opinions

As Gomer Pile would say, surprise, surprise, surprise! Today we went to one of our neuros and I was shocked to hear him say a few things that are completely contrary to what our primary neuro has told us. Anyone have any opinion on who is right? Here are the topics:

1. Eating. One neuro told us protein completely blocks the sinemet so that you don't get it at all, the effect is the same as if you didn't even take the drug. Today neuro #2 tells us no, the protein merely delays the drug getting into the brain, but it does get in there. What is your take on this? We feel neuro #1 is correct-if we eat any protein during the day, the whole day is pretty much shot.

2. Vision. Neuro #1 told us our vision problems were cause by the lack of the eyes to converge like they used to, due to low dopamine. Clearly PD related. Today neuro #2 says nope, it's just fatigue. Has nothing to do with the PD. His advice? Close the eyes and rest them for a bit. OK-dokey.

3. Pain. Another eye-popper. All the back and neck pain we have? Neuro #1says its the PD: neuro #2 is telling us we have bad posture and need to do stretching exercises, it's not PD related at all. What the $#!

4. My favorite contradiction of the day (and it's not even lunchtime!): med dosing. We were trying to split med doses up so that we were taking them hourly, to minimize the peaks between sinemet dosages and the sleepiness side effect of Mirapex. Neuro #1 says great, that's the best/"optimal" way to take the drugs if you can stick with that schedule, because it is an even distribution of the meds (as even as we can get without a pump or patch). So he is pleased.

Problem is, hourly med schedules are damn near impossible to stick with. We have had to switch to a two hour schedule, which we discussed with Neuro #2 today...his comment: there's no real difference or need to take the meds on an hourly basis as opposed to every two hours, no difference at all. What? Does anyone here have any experience that would indicate better symptomatic relief on a one versus two hour schedule?

These two guys are the top in our metropolitan area, so they are not hacks. Anyone have any thoughts on who is right?
lurkingforacure is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boston area neuros? Riverwild Multiple Sclerosis 8 03-30-2009 09:26 AM
Good and bad neuros - which is which? dahlek Peripheral Neuropathy 34 01-03-2008 12:05 AM
And now for something completely different Alkymst Peripheral Neuropathy 12 04-06-2007 12:49 PM
Not completely convinced I have TN phillyinpain Trigeminal Neuralgia 7 01-29-2007 01:56 PM
Do all neuros Suck turner Myasthenia Gravis 31 12-11-2006 08:45 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.