Parkinson's Disease Tulip


advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-12-2012, 10:11 AM #11
Arsippe Arsippe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 77
10 yr Member
Arsippe Arsippe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 77
10 yr Member
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by pwpboy View Post
Every PD patient has its own progression of PD. In clinical trials as conducted right now, because of this it is very difficult to find out if an agent is neuroprotective. A biomarker is the solution to this problem. So Arsippe, this is a very important result.
Good! I was hoping someone would set me straight... I am a newbie and at this point am relying on you all to help me keep to the right path. Thanks (and also to Laura)!
Arsippe is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

advertisement
Old 09-13-2012, 12:09 PM #12
olsen's Avatar
olsen olsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,860
15 yr Member
olsen olsen is offline
Senior Member
olsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,860
15 yr Member
Default biomarkers and treatments

From original reference abstract:
"Moreover, treatments targeting this malfunction in preclinical models delayed or reversed disease symptoms."

Anyone able to determine what these treatments are?
__________________
In the last analysis, we see only what we are ready to see, what we have been taught to see. We eliminate and ignore everything that is not a part of our prejudices.

~ Jean-Martin Charcot


The future is already here — it's just not very evenly distributed. William Gibson
olsen is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 01:13 PM #13
Conductor71's Avatar
Conductor71 Conductor71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,474
15 yr Member
Conductor71 Conductor71 is offline
Senior Member
Conductor71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,474
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by olsen View Post
From original reference abstract:
"Moreover, treatments targeting this malfunction in preclinical models delayed or reversed disease symptoms."

Anyone able to determine what these treatments are?
I noted the secretiveness too. I know a PWP in a Facebook group whose doctor was in on the study. Here is what she posted:

My doc says the study is promising (and supports studies about the protein alpha synuclein)--that they can see that there is impaired efficiency in the transport of cargo proteins in people with PD. In animal models, targeting this impairment seems to slow/stop progression. The study had 12 participants with PD, and now they are putting together a second study with 45 people here in San Fran. I'm thinking of participating. My doc emailed me the paper on the study

Interesting...looks like treatment was with nocodazole:

Nocodazole is an anti-neoplastic agent which exerts its effect in cells by interfering with the polymerization of microtubules. Microtubules are one type of fibre which constitutes the cytoskeleton, and the dynamic microtubule network has several important roles in the cell, including vesicular transport, forming the mitotic spindle and in cytokinesis.

If you would like a copy. please PM me.

Laura
Conductor71 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
anagirl (09-13-2012), Nan Cyclist (09-13-2012), olsen (09-14-2012), shcg (09-15-2012), soccertese (09-13-2012), wordsmithy (09-14-2012)
Old 09-13-2012, 03:26 PM #14
anagirl anagirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 199
10 yr Member
anagirl anagirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 199
10 yr Member
Default

Hi Laura,
Thank you so much for posting this info - it's so interesting.
By any chance did you FB friend mention where the study is (UCSF?). I live in San Francisco too and would be interested in participating, if there is room left.

Thanks!
Ana
anagirl is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 06:37 PM #15
Conductor71's Avatar
Conductor71 Conductor71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,474
15 yr Member
Conductor71 Conductor71 is offline
Senior Member
Conductor71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,474
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anagirl View Post
Hi Laura,
Thank you so much for posting this info - it's so interesting.
By any chance did you FB friend mention where the study is (UCSF?). I live in San Francisco too and would be interested in participating, if there is room left.

Thanks!
Ana
Ana,

Yes! It is UCSF. I can get her doctor's name and forward it with article.

Laura
Conductor71 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 07:17 PM #16
anagirl anagirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 199
10 yr Member
anagirl anagirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 199
10 yr Member
Default

Thank you so much!
anagirl is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 08:27 PM #17
Conductor71's Avatar
Conductor71 Conductor71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,474
15 yr Member
Conductor71 Conductor71 is offline
Senior Member
Conductor71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,474
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anagirl View Post
Hi Laura,
Thank you so much for posting this info - it's so interesting.
By any chance did you FB friend mention where the study is (UCSF?). I live in San Francisco too and would be interested in participating, if there is room left.

Thanks!
Ana
Ana,

I tried to PM you but could not. I need your private e-mail to share the full text article
Conductor71 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 08:59 PM #18
anagirl anagirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 199
10 yr Member
anagirl anagirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 199
10 yr Member
Default

Hi Laura,
I tried to post a PM for you too and could not. I must be doing something wrong! I'm working on updating my profile and trying to figure out how to use this site.
anagirl is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 09-15-2012, 09:18 AM #19
Debi Brooks Debi Brooks is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 312
15 yr Member
Debi Brooks Debi Brooks is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 312
15 yr Member
Default validating biomarkers

Progression biomarkers are essential for development of disease modifying drugs. Without them, most drug makers won't bother.

MJFF has been leading to search for biomarkers since 2002 and has funded probably close to $50M by now with at least another $50M still needed.

The study finding posted has encouraging results at an early stage. Very exciting. It looks to distinguish PD from non PD in a small population. We've already committed funds to test it further (can read outs distinguish "stages" of PD?--a step toward seeing if it illuminates progression). It has just been supplemented so it might be a couple of years (depends on patient recruitment among other things -- slow recruitment will slow results). If it holds in the supplement, then it would likely be a candidate to use PPMI samples.

That is the beauty of PPMI...it enables us to evaluate candidates that have already shown promise in the two stages mentioned above and now need to be "verified" in the larger PPMI population (as the subjects are recruited we get more data about the current candidates). Ultimately, reserves of the data and biosamples collected in PPMI will stand ready (banked for future use). So let's say this particular new idea gets positive results in its supplement, then the PPMI infrastructure will enable a fast turnaround in the critical verification stage. Future verifications can happen relatively quickly and at relatively low cost since the PPMI resources will have the needed elements standing ready. I hope this makes sense.

I guess my final point is that this new finding is indeed exciting (and we are already moving it forward) but there are some candidates that are even further along in this process.

Essential progress coming from a very deliberate, very expensive but highly orchestrated strategy that MJFF has been driving for the past decade. Because this is what it takes. It is clear that in the absence of us driving (the work and with leadership/high risk funds) this kind of achievement would not be possible.

Debi

PS: Lots more information on biomarkers on our website in the "priority areas"
here https://www.michaeljfox.org/research...php?biomarkers
Debi Brooks is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
anagirl (09-15-2012), Thelma (09-15-2012)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KineMed biomarker Diego24 Parkinson's Disease 0 06-27-2012 09:17 AM
Tremor a Biomarker? rd42 Parkinson's Disease 7 01-07-2012 12:16 PM
Urate a biomarker? paula_w Parkinson's Disease 6 10-02-2008 01:36 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.