Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-20-2015, 03:41 PM #1
jurgen975 jurgen975 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 181
15 yr Member
jurgen975 jurgen975 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 181
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by northerngal View Post
I did not involve the FDA at all in my appeal process.
I researched rituxin and printed out several cases in which it was effective to use as examples. I got a letter of support from my doctor, stating that she recommended it as the next step for me. I copied several pub med and other reputable articles regarding rituxin.
Even with all the above information, my written appeal was denied. I then requested a phone hearing. I had all of the information in front of me during that hearing. Like I said in the above post, I feel it was more my knowledge on my condition and treatment options, and the fact that the doctor on the board from Anthem BCBS had no experience with either, is what won the case for me.
My best advice is go to the hearing prepared, you have a lot of knowledge regarding your condition. Research the treatment/ medication you are looking to get and give them examples similar to your own where it has been successful. Make them aware of other treatments/medications you have tried and failed----especially if they are first line treatments.
Insurance companies always want to assure we have tried first line, less extensive, less expensive treatment options if they are available.
The treatment i am talking about is still in a clinical phase and is starting a pahse 3 study next year.
I had never any treatment for this condition except for 5 mouths of gabapentine and in the early days about 100 electro acapuncture treatments including the supplement i have taken almost to this day.
The treatment is currently only tested on people with diabatics however a a genetic altered growth hormone should work for all kind of polyneuropatisch and i think this would give me a change.
Did you get a letter of a family MD or a neuroligist?.

So to sum it up i dont have any example where this treatment works for somebody with a toxic PN just for people with a diabetic PN it is working very good.
jurgen975 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-20-2015, 05:14 PM #2
northerngal northerngal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 179
10 yr Member
northerngal northerngal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 179
10 yr Member
Default

Maybe when you write an appeal or request you should just focus on the use of this treatment you want for peripheral neuropathy in general and not specify toxic or diabetic.
Is it something you are looking at for pain? Pain can be an issue in diabetic or toxic induced nerve damage. If it something aimed at specifically altering your blood sugar and you don't have any blood sugar issues, then would it even be of any benefit to you?
northerngal is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
compassionate allowances for SSDI chasmo Parkinson's Disease 2 10-28-2008 02:58 AM
California Compassionate Choices Act BobbyB Survivors of Suicide 2 03-29-2007 12:16 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.