advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-23-2016, 09:30 AM #1
janieg's Avatar
janieg janieg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 792
10 yr Member
janieg janieg is offline
Member
janieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 792
10 yr Member
Default Possible reason for incorrect skin biopsy results - Therapth

Therapath put out this PR a couple of days ago:

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-relea...300206822.html

If I'm reading it right, skin biopsy results can be skewed if they are not kept cold enough when "preserved" in one of two common substances (fixatives) used for transport to Therapath.

If you look at their website, there's big reason hospitals/doctors might use the fixative that is subject to error prone results if not kept cold:

1. The shelf life of the problematic one is a year, while the shelf life of better option is only 4 weeks.
2. The better one must be kept refrigerated until used, while the other one can be stored at room temperature.

https://www.therapath.com/fixative

So if you get a biopsy, it sounds like you might want to request the PLP fixative...if it's even an option. Obviously there are reasons hospitals would only offer the Zamboni fixative.

Last edited by janieg; 01-23-2016 at 11:20 AM.
janieg is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
bluesfan (01-25-2016), Cliffman (01-23-2016), DavidHC (01-23-2016), glenntaj (01-24-2016), Itneverends (01-31-2016), madisongrrl (01-23-2016), mrsD (01-23-2016), St George 2013 (01-25-2016), zkrp01 (01-24-2016)

advertisement
Old 01-23-2016, 10:53 AM #2
Healthgirl Healthgirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 791
8 yr Member
Healthgirl Healthgirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 791
8 yr Member
Default

Does this mean that people are being diagnosed with nerve fiber damage who don't actually have damage? Or that is being under diagnosed?
Healthgirl is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-23-2016, 11:18 AM #3
janieg's Avatar
janieg janieg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 792
10 yr Member
janieg janieg is offline
Member
janieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 792
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Healthgirl View Post
Does this mean that people are being diagnosed with nerve fiber damage who don't actually have damage? Or that is being under diagnosed?
I'm reading it as over-diagnosed.

"Specimens shipped in Zamboni's solution at ambient temperature presented with a significant reduction of immune staining that could lead to an incorrect diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy.

_______________________________________
janieg is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
mrsD (01-23-2016), St George 2013 (01-25-2016), zkrp01 (01-24-2016)
Old 01-23-2016, 12:10 PM #4
DavidHC DavidHC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 732
8 yr Member
DavidHC DavidHC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 732
8 yr Member
Default

Just a couple of thoughts. I agree, I think that's the most natural way to read it, but physicians often speak without precision when it comes to language itself, so I can also see them perhaps meaning it neutrally so both false positives and false negatives: "incorrect diagnosis" period. But perhaps they're speaking precisely here and they just mean what you say. I'm inclined to read it like you, at least naturally, but I can't be sure. Regardless, it's worth asking about this and noting that one has a preference for one over the other, given this information. Also, since they look for morphology on these biopsies too, it's worth noting that improper handling may degrade both the nerve fiber density and the morphology of the sample, I don't know.

Thanks for posting this. Before my biopsy I had read that often the results can be influenced by poor handling, but I didn't know the solution mattered in this way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by janieg View Post
I'm reading it as over-diagnosed.

"Specimens shipped in Zamboni's solution at ambient temperature presented with a significant reduction of immune staining that could lead to an incorrect diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy.

_______________________________________
DavidHC is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
mrsD (01-23-2016), St George 2013 (01-25-2016), zkrp01 (01-24-2016)
Old 01-23-2016, 08:19 PM #5
Healthgirl Healthgirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 791
8 yr Member
Healthgirl Healthgirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 791
8 yr Member
Default

All I know is that I wish mine was misdiagnosed! I even asked the doctor if there was any chance that it was a false positive. Of course she said no. I was so crushed to read the results of significant reduced density.
Healthgirl is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
Cliffman (01-24-2016), madisongrrl (01-23-2016), St George 2013 (01-25-2016), zkrp01 (01-24-2016)
Old 01-23-2016, 09:47 PM #6
madisongrrl's Avatar
madisongrrl madisongrrl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midwest
Posts: 584
8 yr Member
madisongrrl madisongrrl is offline
Member
madisongrrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midwest
Posts: 584
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Healthgirl View Post
All I know is that I wish mine was misdiagnosed! I even asked the doctor if there was any chance that it was a false positive. Of course she said no. I was so crushed to read the results of significant reduced density.
Where are you at these days with tracking down a cause?
__________________
  • Gabapentin, Nortriptyline, & Low Dose Naltrexone
  • Methylcobalamin/Methylfolate, & Vitamin D3/K2
  • Phosphatidyl Choline, Phosphatidyl Serine & Probiotics
madisongrrl is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-24-2016, 04:27 AM #7
Neuroproblem Neuroproblem is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 355
8 yr Member
Neuroproblem Neuroproblem is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 355
8 yr Member
Default

it does make sense, samples should be kept cold, because the heat will activate protease or degradation of samples.
Neuroproblem is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
Cliffman (01-24-2016), St George 2013 (01-25-2016)
Old 01-24-2016, 06:51 AM #8
Cliffman Cliffman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 286
8 yr Member
Cliffman Cliffman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 286
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Healthgirl View Post
All I know is that I wish mine was misdiagnosed! I even asked the doctor if there was any chance that it was a false positive. Of course she said no. I was so crushed to read the results of significant reduced density.
I felt the same way. I didn't even get the news directly from my doctor, the lab gladly emailed me the results. When I opened the report I had to read it twice before it fully registered in my mind. I will never forget reading "significantly reduced density" in big bold caps. I was crushed to say the least! Yet when I saw my Neuro doctor she was almost gleeful with the results. She said with a smile "this is good because now we have a diagnosis". She insists that patients with SFN can lead a very normal life if they just take the medicine. She made an comparison to someone that has high blood pressure. It can't be cured so you just take blood pressure medicine and all is fine. It angers me because I don't think one can compare high blood pressure to the hideous nature of SFN, especially given the drugs used are not truly designed for nerve pain.

Cliffman
Cliffman is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
DavidHC (01-24-2016), Itneverends (01-31-2016), St George 2013 (01-25-2016), zkrp01 (01-24-2016)
Old 01-24-2016, 10:01 AM #9
Healthgirl Healthgirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 791
8 yr Member
Healthgirl Healthgirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 791
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliffman View Post
I felt the same way. I didn't even get the news directly from my doctor, the lab gladly emailed me the results. When I opened the report I had to read it twice before it fully registered in my mind. I will never forget reading "significantly reduced density" in big bold caps. I was crushed to say the least! Yet when I saw my Neuro doctor she was almost gleeful with the results. She said with a smile "this is good because now we have a diagnosis". She insists that patients with SFN can lead a very normal life if they just take the medicine. She made an comparison to someone that has high blood pressure. It can't be cured so you just take blood pressure medicine and all is fine. It angers me because I don't think one can compare high blood pressure to the hideous nature of SFN, especially given the drugs used are not truly designed for nerve pain.

Cliffman
My first doctor was the same. She was very cold and matter of fact. When responding to my distress at this unexplained nerve damage, she said "you are not in a wheelchair". "You will need medications to manage this". The meds she wanted to put me on right away were severe so I got a new doctor. He is completely on board with me not wanting to take daily meds, understands how awful it is and gave at least a little hope.
I think some people with SFN that mildly affects the sensory nerves might be able to live a normal life. Different people are affected more deeply into their nervous systems and they have different causes. For some it is just some occasional tingling and numb spots and for others it causes autonomic problems that cause malfunctioning of the very bodily functions taken for granted by those who "live a normal life". The pain can be debilitating to the point where it can knock one down to the floor or leave you holding onto a wall or counter top. If eyes are affected, the flickering lights, tunnel vision, blurriness can make it hard enough to walk, let alone drive. I could go on and I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but how is that a normal life?
If any of these doctors could experience a day like this, I think they would realize that for many people this is deeper than the findings of just "sfn" and skin sensations.
Healthgirl is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
Cliffman (01-24-2016), DavidHC (01-24-2016), echoes long ago (01-31-2016), Itneverends (01-31-2016), Marie33 (02-01-2016), St George 2013 (01-25-2016), zkrp01 (01-24-2016)
Old 01-24-2016, 10:04 AM #10
Healthgirl Healthgirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 791
8 yr Member
Healthgirl Healthgirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 791
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by madisongrrl View Post
Where are you at these days with tracking down a cause?
No where yet. I have an appointment with a toxicology dr and a functional md next month. Hoping they can help.
How are you doing with the lyme treatment?
Healthgirl is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Skin biopsy results panther Peripheral Neuropathy 20 01-01-2016 11:32 AM
Skin Biopsy Results Mere Peripheral Neuropathy 34 02-01-2010 05:38 AM
skin biopsy results amit Peripheral Neuropathy 6 05-14-2009 06:23 AM
Skin biopsy results KrisC Peripheral Neuropathy 15 07-10-2008 07:53 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.