Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-2008, 07:17 AM #1
glenntaj glenntaj is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,857
15 yr Member
glenntaj glenntaj is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,857
15 yr Member
Default Vanity, vanity, vanity.

It is amazing what people will do--and what might happen due to what they do--because of this one little word.

I'm don't mean this flippantly--there are serious concerns with self-image for many people. But (especially as a proponent of rational-emotive psychotherapies), I think it's safer--and far more long-lasting--to change the self-image psychologically.

As I wrote before, I can certainly see situations in which an implant (of any sort) might be necessitated to bring back some aspect of vital functioning. But with most of them being done for aesthetics rather than vital function . . .

Think we need to free ourselves from the tyranny of measuing up to whatever unreasonable physical standrard we have in our heads first. I imagine THAT may all by itself slow down the rate of medical spending.
glenntaj is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-12-2008, 02:51 PM #2
Undecided Undecided is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 18
15 yr Member
Undecided Undecided is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 18
15 yr Member
Default

THANK YOU Ladies!
Undecided is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-12-2008, 11:17 PM #3
bethtaylor bethtaylor is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NoImplants, Pennsylvania
Posts: 27
15 yr Member
bethtaylor bethtaylor is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NoImplants, Pennsylvania
Posts: 27
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glenntaj View Post
It is amazing what people will do--and what might happen due to what they do--because of this one little word.

I'm don't mean this flippantly--there are serious concerns with self-image for many people. But (especially as a proponent of rational-emotive psychotherapies), I think it's safer--and far more long-lasting--to change the self-image psychologically.

As I wrote before, I can certainly see situations in which an implant (of any sort) might be necessitated to bring back some aspect of vital functioning. But with most of them being done for aesthetics rather than vital function . . .

Think we need to free ourselves from the tyranny of measuing up to whatever unreasonable physical standrard we have in our heads first. I imagine THAT may all by itself slow down the rate of medical spending.
It may be easy to change self image for some people but not all. When you are raised to believe you don't measure up from your own parents then that is something very hard to reverse if not impossible. I've been through years of therapy and I must say that it did more harm than good.

I also think that the media plays a huge role in this. We all open a magazine or turn on the TV and see what the 'perfect' woman should look like and those images are not very realistic.

Once that changes, if it ever does, then I suspect that we will see less and less women getting implants and cosmetic surgery.
bethtaylor is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-17-2008, 09:07 AM #4
glenntaj glenntaj is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,857
15 yr Member
glenntaj glenntaj is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,857
15 yr Member
Default And here is the NY Times weighing in:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/17/fa...IN.html?ref=us

The article concentrates more on the inconvenience of maintenance than illness-producing outcomes of implantation surgery, but the implication is certainly there.
glenntaj is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-17-2008, 09:54 AM #5
bethtaylor bethtaylor is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NoImplants, Pennsylvania
Posts: 27
15 yr Member
bethtaylor bethtaylor is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NoImplants, Pennsylvania
Posts: 27
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glenntaj View Post
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/17/fa...IN.html?ref=us

The article concentrates more on the inconvenience of maintenance than illness-producing outcomes of implantation surgery, but the implication is certainly there.
Most of the articles I've read only concentrate on the inconvenience and very few even mention saline implants. If they do, they say that if saline implants rupture, it is just sterile saline and will flush out of your body. So untrue about it being sterile as I know that these implants grow all kinds of bacteria and mold inside their shells.
bethtaylor is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.