Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-12-2008, 09:52 PM #11
dahlek dahlek is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: metro DC suburbs
Posts: 2,576
15 yr Member
dahlek dahlek is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: metro DC suburbs
Posts: 2,576
15 yr Member
Default Biopsies are no longer considered the 'standard' per se..

Please take a look at this relatively recent set of info regarding auto-immune CIDP... It does address the issue of 'nerve biopsies' as important or not to diagnosis.
http://www.cidpinfo.com/diagnosis/index.aspx It includes two different 'set's of diagnostic criteria...you can tell if a doc is 'up to date' by how they approach all this?
I bring this up because the skin punch biopsy is FAR FAR preferable to diagnose neuropathies than what's called a full 'Seural Nerve Biopsy'.
I also bring this up because many here in the past have undergone this latter procedure with some complications and side effects. The only thing that it could do.....The Seural biopsy, that is, is prove that nerves are DEAD! The side effects of the procedure are rife with potential infections and many stellar insurance companies no longer cover this procedure as one necessary for diagnosis.
I had encountered one neuro [briefly for all of two office visits] until he'd suggested that I have this 'procedure'. I thot it peculiar until I realized that HE wanted to get this 'procedure' on his resume, when all other tests were clearly indicating my diagnosis - according to that CIDP-info site.... This was in 2004. I am truly glad that I'd declined!
Do the skin punch biopsy first, and if THAT is inconclusive, maybe then consider a seural biopsy...but only after really, really looking at all the pro's and cons. To me it's a very nasty procedure that seems now to be 'out of favor' and honestly? FINE BY ME! I was lucky enough that other testing [a sort of 9 out of 10 rule {biopsy excluded}] enabled me to escape the seural biopsy. In '04, the punch biopsy was still considered VERY 'experimental'. I do believe it's gonna be accepted practice soon, as it's soo much less invasive.
In all honesty, all either will do is tell you that existing skin has DEAD NERVES. It can prove your case for some things? But, it really will not change one whit how you are treated, nor how well.
Pain control, lifestyle modifications, and any immune therapies are key to getting by/and on with this stuff. Any which way, it's no pic-nic for sure! And we just hunker down and get on with it all as best we can. 's - j
dahlek is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
this is our "Gold Standard drug" - carbidopa/ levodopa side affects! please read... lou_lou Parkinson's Disease 5 09-03-2008 07:27 PM
NEWS: Parkinson’s Clinic of the Ozarks named to “gold standard” in Parkinson’s care Stitcher Parkinson's Disease 12 08-08-2007 09:01 PM
"Gold Standard" rant NancyM Gluten Sensitivity / Celiac Disease 9 01-13-2007 07:16 PM
origins of "the gold standard"? boann Parkinson's Disease 11 10-31-2006 05:59 PM
Is the neuropathological ‘gold standard’ diagnosis dead? ZucchiniFlower Parkinson's Disease 2 10-31-2006 03:40 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.