FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
#4 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
So, I had the test last week, and all I could think was how laughably imprecise it was.
As expected, I was a bit abnormal but not enough to say anything for sure. My cold/heat-detection tests were in the normal range, every time, at every site they did... and they were the most important ones apparently. My cold/heat pain thresholds were often elevated but I found it quite a tricky test. At what point do you say something's painful? Yeah, you can feel it, yeah, it's cold, but is it painful? For me to actually click a button to say I'm feeling pain, it'd probably actually need to be hot enough to cause some damage, which obviously it can't do. So, I'm still in no-mans land with no SFN diagnosis either way, and am waiting to see if the doctors here in the UK will give me a skin biopsy, which is still in trials here and not widely used. Otherwise, I am going to have get it done on my next visit to the US, or see if I can a pack sent over an analyzed stateside. What a pain. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More testing | Multiple Sclerosis | |||
Gene Testing -California Orders To Stop Gene Testing! | Parkinson's Disease | |||
Temperature & Vibration Threshold tests | Peripheral Neuropathy | |||
DNA Testing | Epilepsy | |||
testing for vitamin deficiancy possibilities/ than testing geneticcode probability? | Parkinson's Disease |