Quote:
Originally Posted by LIT LOVE
The above was my only objection. Saying she went on vacation to go rock climbing or to use a jet ski is a wee bit different.
Frankly, with as hostile as much of the general public seems to be towards those that receive disability (until it happens to them or to a close family member) it kind of stumps me when people get away with blatant fraud.
Many moons ago, during a WC deposition, the insurance attorney rather indignantly and nastily asked me about my ardent knitting hobby that a co-worker had informed on me about. Clearly that was the real culprit behind my injury. It was quite an "ah-hah!" moment until I burst out laughing hysterically. I have never once knitted. Maybe someone confused a memory, or maybe they just lied. At least I was able to respond to the accusation.
If I have a point, I guess it's this:
Your own habits are now going to be under a continual microscope for any and all to judge, simply because they feel entitled if you make a disability claim. And while you may have nothing to hide, it isn't enjoyable to have strangers, neighbors, extended family, and so on--condescend to whether or not they think you deserve disability benefits.
My health and status of disability should be between me and my doctor.
Well okay, and Social Security. Hmm, and a gaggle of WC case workers, investigators, hired gun docs, and attorneys.
I'm actually surprised WC never questioned you or your husband about your neighbor's activities. That is something they commonly do.
Perhaps your neighbor really had a pysch claim and it was less embarrassing to pretend her disability was physical, or maybe she truly was committing fraud. Who knows?
You chose not to report it, or confront her with your minister, so that ship has sailed...
|
How absolutely absurd that you had to endure such treatment. That must have been an emotionally devastating experience that you will never forget. I hope you never have to endure that again.
As regards my former neighbor my husband and I never got involved. Since my husband is a psychologist we both wondered, if my neighbor might and claimed RSD because that was more socially acceptable than a psychiatric problem. A few days before my neighbor moved, however, her daughter who lived with her came over to say goodbye. Her daughter expressed her extreme frustration because she claimed that she had accompanied her mother to doctors appointment for years for treatment for RSD but knew her mother was faking it, based on the same observations that we had. We did not comment because it made us quite uncomfortable. She also indicated that she could no longer live with her mother or participate in her mother's life because her conscience was causing her extreme anxiety. She reported being alienated from her father because although he knew his wife was faking it stated that they needed the money and his wife refused to work.
When I applied for SSDI the case worker explained to me that the paperwork and application process had recently been tightened up. I did not question her but was fine with that due to the experience with my former neighbor. I found the application process stressful and arduous but fair. I was glad to see a system that seemed accountable and I did not view any of the questions or requests for medical records unreasonable.
My point is that folks who have beaten the system make is hard on the folks who physically cannot work. It is because of my experience with this former neighbor that I believe SSDI requests should indeed be scrutinized.