advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-13-2014, 04:28 AM #1
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
Default

If you received the short form and haven't seen a doc about whatever qualified you for SSI or SSDI, then you will likely be sent the long form CDR in the next 6 weeks or so. (Or perhaps, you already have the long form.)

The long form CDR process is comparable to going through the original application process to qualify for SSI /SSDI. SS will likely send you to a consulting doc/s paid by SS. Sometimes applicants/recipients are very unhappy with the results of those exams. Sometimes the exams are very rushed.

SS used to have less stringent requirements for SSI recipients that qualified as children, and allowed them to continue receiving benefits as adults. For certain conditions, it is now much more difficult to continue receiving benefits.

So, there are lots of factors that could make the CDR process more complicated than you'd imagine. The suggestions given here by several of us are to try and prepare you for a worst case scenario, so that you are not blindsided. If your benefits are ceased, you will be able to appeal, but having current medical records would likely be necessary.
LIT LOVE is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 08-13-2014, 11:35 AM #2
Aspie Aspie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 30
8 yr Member
Aspie Aspie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 30
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LIT LOVE View Post
Sometimes applicants/recipients are very unhappy with the results of those exams. Sometimes the exams are very rushed.

SS used to have less stringent requirements for SSI recipients that qualified as children, and allowed them to continue receiving benefits as adults. For certain conditions, it is now much more difficult to continue receiving benefits.

So, there are lots of factors that could make the CDR process more complicated than you'd imagine.
It didn't seem very rushed and they approved fairly quickly from what they believed the case to be, which is true.

I was 23 years old when I applied and was granted assistance. I am now 37 with this review update.

The DSM on my condition changed, that shouldn't make it more difficult for those of us that have it. Social Security is obviously aware of the change.

Again, the evaluation report I have would be what the one that diagnosed me. Not like the information in black and white would miraculously change.
/

Last edited by Aspie; 08-13-2014 at 02:11 PM.
Aspie is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 08-13-2014, 05:11 PM #3
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aspie View Post
It didn't seem very rushed and they approved fairly quickly from what they believed the case to be, which is true.

I was 23 years old when I applied and was granted assistance. I am now 37 with this review update.

The DSM on my condition changed, that shouldn't make it more difficult for those of us that have it. Social Security is obviously aware of the change.

Again, the evaluation report I have would be what the one that diagnosed me. Not like the information in black and white would miraculously change.
/
You are free to ignore any info we provide, but understand we are trying to help you.

http://autisticadvocacy.org/wp-conte...ASAN_final.pdf It appears that SS will not consider your older diagnosis valid and will expect you to be retested.

Last edited by LIT LOVE; 08-13-2014 at 05:28 PM. Reason: better link
LIT LOVE is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 08-14-2014, 04:04 AM #4
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aspie View Post
It didn't seem very rushed and they approved fairly quickly from what they believed the case to be, which is true.

I was 23 years old when I applied and was granted assistance. I am now 37 with this review update.

The DSM on my condition changed, that shouldn't make it more difficult for those of us that have it. Social Security is obviously aware of the change.

Again, the evaluation report I have would be what the one that diagnosed me. Not like the information in black and white would miraculously change.
/
When you qualified for SS benefits, Asperger's was included as a "Listed Impairment" but since the DSM has changed, that is apparently no longer automatically the case.

Your condition is possibly the same, it might be better, or it might be worse. So long as you're alive, you're susceptible to change--both negative and positive. And I'm not saying that your Asperger's itself has changed, but rather your ability, or inability, to adapt to your disability--and therefore your ability to work. Some people have found that going to college or utilizing Vocational Rehabilitation Training, has helped them learn to adapt in the workforce.

I would not personally trust a Consultative Examiner to spend the time to adequately diagnose me. If SS decides you need to be retested, and IF you no longer qualify with a "listed impairment", you may still qualify via SS's 5 step process to determine SSI/SSDI eligibility. But that is process is not as easy as what you dealt with previously.


"Exceptions to the Medical Improvement Standard

The SSA does not need to show that your impairment has medically improved if:

•you are working over the SGA level
•you have had vocational training that makes it possible for you to return to work (for example, your RFC limited you to sedentary work and you are now qualified for sedentary work because of a class you took)
a new method for evaluating the severity of your condition shows you are not disabled, or
•there was an error in the initial determination and you should not have been found disabled (for example, clear evidence was found in your file that shows you didn't qualify for disability, or new evidence clearly refutes prior evidence that you were disabled).

In these cases (called Group I Exceptions), the examiner does not need to find medical improvement in your case. However, the examiner still must find that you are not currently disabled to deny you benefits; that is, that you are capable of performing substantial gainful activity."

link quoted directly above:
http://www.disabilitysecrets.com/dne...ss-social.html

link to forum about Consultative Exams:
http://ssdfacts.com/forum/index.php?board=13.0

link about 5 step process:
http://www.ssa.gov/dibplan/dqualify5.htm
LIT LOVE is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
sable081 (05-01-2015)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mailer Form SSA-455 Disability Update Report rich1326 Social Security Disability 66 10-22-2015 02:27 PM
just recieved my short form disibility report gilbert Social Security Disability 1 08-04-2013 10:52 PM
New Member Here--Have Question on SSDI Short Form Review SSA-455-OCR-SM? Hugapug New Member Introductions 3 11-01-2012 12:51 AM
disability update form C324 Social Security Disability 1 11-22-2011 10:22 PM
Question about short-term disability DebMurphy Trigeminal Neuralgia 4 12-28-2008 09:29 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.