FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Grand Magnate
|
Hi all,
I'm in the process of finding representation. I've found a lawyer near my town who seems to have good credentials. Regarding his fee agreement: it states the normal doodad about getting 25% of back pay with a limit of $6,000. HOWEVER: it says... if you are denied at the original hearing and it must be appealed and then you are awarded a new hearing and upon the new hearing you are granted benefits, the $6000 limit is dropped due to the amount of work involved. So, in essence he gets 25% of ALL back pay with NO limit. So basically, using easy math let's say a person is awarded $1,000/month. If the whole process takes 3 yrs, that is $36,000 of back pay 25% of that = $9,000 and if it drags out 4 yrs, that is 48,000. 25% of that = $12,000 he gets. Is this standard? Is there really 'that' much more work involved for him? of course the SSA has to authorize the amount he gets, but I mean, wow. Wouldn't this give him incentive to 'want' to let it drag out? One would hope not, but....just saying. ![]() Thanks for any input Rae |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Phone company fees | The Stumble Inn |