Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-06-2014, 02:41 AM #1
Janke Janke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 686
15 yr Member
Janke Janke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 686
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrae View Post
Hi all,
I'm in the process of finding representation. I've found a lawyer near my town who seems to have good credentials.
Regarding his fee agreement: it states the normal doodad about getting 25% of back pay with a limit of $6,000.

HOWEVER: it says...
if you are denied at the original hearing and it must be appealed and then you are awarded a new hearing and upon the new hearing you are granted benefits, the $6000 limit is dropped due to the amount of work involved.
So, in essence he gets 25% of ALL back pay with NO limit.

So basically, using easy math let's say a person is awarded $1,000/month.
If the whole process takes 3 yrs, that is $36,000 of back pay
25% of that = $9,000
and if it drags out 4 yrs, that is 48,000.
25% of that = $12,000 he gets.

Is this standard? Is there really 'that' much more work involved for him?
of course the SSA has to authorize the amount he gets, but I mean, wow.

Wouldn't this give him incentive to 'want' to let it drag out?
One would hope not, but....just saying.

Thanks for any input
Rae
If you already have this opinion about your potential representative, then he is not the right one for you.

Another point to think about is that the attorney could also put in hours and hours of work (and attorneys generally bill out at $200-$500 an hour) and get no money at all. At that point, the lawyer would file a fee petition and document every phone call (billing at 1/4 hour), the time it takes him or his staff to complete appeal forms, the time it takes him to read your medical records or prepare a pre-hearing brief, the time he spends in the prehearing discussion with you, etc. etc. If you are the kind of person who wants your lawyer to explain everything, every step of the way, all of those 15 minute phone calls could easily add up quickly

What action or inaction do you believe is under the control of the lawyer in terms of how quickly SSA makes a decision? I suppose agreeing to a date for the hearing is one issue, but a busy representative would have a pretty full calendar and the busy ODAR office doesn't have unlimited empty hearing dates.

But really, if you don't like this clause up front, you won't like it at the back end either so you should probably keep shopping for someone who won't want more money for more work.
Janke is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 01:39 PM #2
Rrae's Avatar
Rrae Rrae is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: i thought it was in my left pocket
Posts: 4,117
15 yr Member
Rrae Rrae is offline
Grand Magnate
Rrae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: i thought it was in my left pocket
Posts: 4,117
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janke View Post
If you already have this opinion about your potential representative, then he is not the right one for you.

But really, if you don't like this clause up front, you won't like it at the back end either so you should probably keep shopping for someone who won't want more money for more work.
I'm brand new at this, don't have a 'clue', overwhelmed, not sure which way to turn, shaking with anxiety, and coming here for support b/c this is a support forum. Though I do appreciate your taking the time to post a response, comments like these kinda feel like a slap in the face.

I do not have an 'opinion' about this particular representative, not sure how you came to that 'opinion'. As a matter of fact, I think this guy IS probably the right one for me. I simply asked if this type of clause is standard procedure with most lawyers.

Never said that I 'didn't like' this clause. Again, I was simply inquiring.

"Keep shopping for someone who won't want more money for more work" .

Not expecting pro bono work after a certain step of the process.

I do thank you for giving me an idea of how much more work an attorney might have to do in a case that drags on. Helps me to see a bit more clearly on what an attorney does behind the scene. Yes, if I were such an attorney, I suppose I'd want more compensation. Makes perfect sense. I suppose all the extra hours he would put into my case would indeed add up to doubling the initial contract amount.

Life is good have a great day

Rae
Rrae is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
St George 2013 (03-06-2014)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phone company fees karilann The Stumble Inn 8 06-02-2013 07:39 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.