Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-04-2014, 10:31 AM #1
Rayandnay Rayandnay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 240
10 yr Member
Rayandnay Rayandnay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 240
10 yr Member
Thumbs up I'm trying

Quote:
Originally Posted by LIT LOVE View Post
Than they're already doing everything possible in your best interest. Be patient, okay?
It's not easy after 102 months, but I truly believe in my heart this is it, 5 of my doctors, 3 of theirs all say the same thing. One other thing Lit, when you file a discrimiantion claim, why doesn't anyone tell you the results of investigation, or does that form go into circular file?
Rayandnay is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-04-2014, 12:30 PM #2
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
15 yr Member
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rayandnay View Post
It's not easy after 102 months, but I truly believe in my heart this is it, 5 of my doctors, 3 of theirs all say the same thing. One other thing Lit, when you file a discrimiantion claim, why doesn't anyone tell you the results of investigation, or does that form go into circular file?

You filed a discrimination claim against someone at SS? Why? When?
LIT LOVE is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-04-2014, 12:50 PM #3
Rayandnay Rayandnay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 240
10 yr Member
Rayandnay Rayandnay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 240
10 yr Member
Book Why, when

Quote:
Originally Posted by LIT LOVE View Post
You filed a discrimination claim against someone at SS? Why? When?
The ALJ that I had 3 hearings with, failed to listen to social securitys doctors, my doctors, even on remand, didn't address appeals council directive on addressing ME who testified at hearing, notorios judge who has a high number of cases remanded. Was warned, he doesn't believe in physche cases, 38% approval rating, just doesn't seem like smart judge. Actually filed 2 discrimiantion charges, latest 10-13, if you don't listen to my doctors or ssa doctors, what chance does anyone have with this guy?
Rayandnay is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-04-2014, 05:18 PM #4
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
15 yr Member
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rayandnay View Post
The ALJ that I had 3 hearings with, failed to listen to social securitys doctors, my doctors, even on remand, didn't address appeals council directive on addressing ME who testified at hearing, notorios judge who has a high number of cases remanded. Was warned, he doesn't believe in physche cases, 38% approval rating, just doesn't seem like smart judge. Actually filed 2 discrimiantion charges, latest 10-13, if you don't listen to my doctors or ssa doctors, what chance does anyone have with this guy?
You've been given a new ALJ, so you've moved your case forward. At this point you need to concentrate on proving your case and your own health.
LIT LOVE is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 08:27 AM #5
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
15 yr Member
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
15 yr Member
Default

I came across these links and thought they might be of some interest to you. I'm guessing the first and second link are more applicable, but that's is just a guess, so I included both. The first gives some suggestions about additional documentation that might be of some help at your ALJ hearing.

http://www.disabilitysecrets.com/res...g-benefits.htm

http://www.disabilitysecrets.com/page9-16.html

http://www.disabilitysecrets.com/page11-10.html
LIT LOVE is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
Rayandnay (10-06-2014)
Old 10-06-2014, 10:27 AM #6
Rayandnay Rayandnay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 240
10 yr Member
Rayandnay Rayandnay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 240
10 yr Member
Thumbs up Good stuff

Quote:
Originally Posted by LIT LOVE View Post
I came across these links and thought they might be of some interest to you. I'm guessing the first and second link are more applicable, but that's is just a guess, so I included both. The first gives some suggestions about additional documentation that might be of some help at your ALJ hearing.

http://www.disabilitysecrets.com/res...g-benefits.htm

http://www.disabilitysecrets.com/page9-16.html

http://www.disabilitysecrets.com/page11-10.html
Thanks, I just have to get a ALJ who will fall the rules, not take things personal, and who's not a war with the Appeals Council, then that box of evidence will mean something. That's why I believe a OTR request is appropriate, because if it's denied, you can gage where your case is weak.
Rayandnay is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 10:46 AM #7
Rayandnay Rayandnay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 240
10 yr Member
Rayandnay Rayandnay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 240
10 yr Member
Book Iq score

Quote:
Originally Posted by LIT LOVE View Post
I came across these links and thought they might be of some interest to you. I'm guessing the first and second link are more applicable, but that's is just a guess, so I included both. The first gives some suggestions about additional documentation that might be of some help at your ALJ hearing.

http://www.disabilitysecrets.com/res...g-benefits.htm

http://www.disabilitysecrets.com/page9-16.html

http://www.disabilitysecrets.com/page11-10.html
Here's the words of the Examinator, "Mr. Jones obtained a full scale iq score of 58, which would classify him in the mental retardation range. However, I am not comfortable assigning this diagnosis, because of his appeared lack of effort likely impacting his true scores. Does this fall into malingering, and this test is thrown out or maybe retesting? Mr. Jones does appear to be experiencing symptoms of major depressive disorder. Aging has to play a part in low iq, and medication.
Rayandnay is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 09:23 PM #8
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
15 yr Member
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rayandnay View Post
Here's the words of the Examinator, "Mr. Jones obtained a full scale iq score of 58, which would classify him in the mental retardation range. However, I am not comfortable assigning this diagnosis, because of his appeared lack of effort likely impacting his true scores. Does this fall into malingering, and this test is thrown out or maybe retesting? Mr. Jones does appear to be experiencing symptoms of major depressive disorder. Aging has to play a part in low iq, and medication.
If accepted, that score would qualify for a listing of intellectual developmental disorder, but I think there is almost no chance you'll receive an OTR decision with the qualifications the Examiner wrote.

I believe an ALJ could deny you benefits at a hearing based upon what that Examiner wrote.

If you could be retested before the ALJ hearing, that would be a VERY good idea.
LIT LOVE is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A request. marion06095 The Stumble Inn 41 10-15-2010 01:50 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.