FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
#11 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
Monica, NC;1983 brain tumor:ceribellium attached to the brain stem; shunted 9 days later due to Dr./nurse error, 11/08 non programmable revision... Find me on facebook: . ref=home#/pepperknowsbest?ref=name or my blog . |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
Would you not be having to give the alotted amount in child support anyway? The money is to care for them. I am pretty sure your state law could tell you that the gardian of the child can use this toward the child's bills or needs.It's not like an allowance.
__________________
Monica, NC;1983 brain tumor:ceribellium attached to the brain stem; shunted 9 days later due to Dr./nurse error, 11/08 non programmable revision... Find me on facebook: . ref=home#/pepperknowsbest?ref=name or my blog . |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
Monica, NC;1983 brain tumor:ceribellium attached to the brain stem; shunted 9 days later due to Dr./nurse error, 11/08 non programmable revision... Find me on facebook: . ref=home#/pepperknowsbest?ref=name or my blog . |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
Would you not be having to give the alotted amount in child support anyway? The money is to care for them. I am pretty sure your state law could tell you that the gardian of the child can use this toward the child's bills or needs.It's not like an allowance.
__________________
Monica, NC;1983 brain tumor:ceribellium attached to the brain stem; shunted 9 days later due to Dr./nurse error, 11/08 non programmable revision... Find me on facebook: . ref=home#/pepperknowsbest?ref=name or my blog . |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
I think I have lost my mind...lol... I couldn't get my post to post it was driving me loony. Until I saw there was a age 2... Sorry
__________________
Monica, NC;1983 brain tumor:ceribellium attached to the brain stem; shunted 9 days later due to Dr./nurse error, 11/08 non programmable revision... Find me on facebook: . ref=home#/pepperknowsbest?ref=name or my blog . |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
|
|||
New Member
|
I was injured on the job in August of 1992, when, as Lead Security Supervisor at a homeless shelter in California. I got my left leg broken at the knee by a former Marine on PCP. For the next eight years, I suffered crippling pain, which the doctors told me I was imagining. I ended up fighting with the SSA for three years, until the Admin Law Judge ruled that the SSA had to give me my benefits, as I had little to no chance of obtaining employment. I don't know what company gives you 70% of your base pay when you are disabled and collecting SSDI, but I am sure missing out on that gravy train. As soon as I was cleared by the doctors to return to full duty, I was let go, and it was like they had never heard of me. Today, I live (?) on SSDI, and my wife gets a pension from the state of Arizona, since her previous husband was killed by a drunk driver while he was employed as a prison guard (off-duty when killed). Neither of us has ever even heard of receiving 70% of base pay while collecting SSDI. If I feel I can work again (not likely, given my disabilities) I have to notify the SSA so they can stop my checks while I am working up to 90 days. If I was too optimisitc, supposedly they restart my checks immediately. I don't have that much faith in our government, sorry.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
My LTD plan pays 60% but some policies do pay 70%, it all depends on the company you worked for before becoming disabled.
The 60% or 70% is not on top (in addition) of SSDI, we are only able to collect a combination of the two benefits, at least that's the case for me, the two work in conjunction with each other. For example, my SSD doesn't equal 60% of my prior pay so the LTD carrier is responsible to make up the difference to bring me up to 60%. In order to collect more than just what SSD pays, you would've had to be able to collect on either a group LTD plan offered through your employer, or purchased a LTD plan on your own. Private LTD is very expensive, but the good thing about having such a plan is that private LTD doesn't usually offset what SSD pays, thus leaving the disabled person in a position to not only collect their full SSD, but also to collect the full percentage of the disability plan that they purchased. Basically a person could collect on both and have a good stream of income while disabled. I'm not on a gravy train by no means, I'm under group LTD, my SSD & LTD are both taxed leaving very little to live on verses what I was making in the past. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
Monica, you are correct, LTD can and often does deny people regardless if a person is awarded SSD. The LTD carriers are supposed to factor in/give weight of an SSD award when making a decison, but often they don't.
I replied to this thread a few days ago and just noticed today that my last posting show up for some reason, I just wanted to let you know I wasn't ignoring your posting. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
Monica, here is my original reply to you, I just located it as I had posted it on the wrong thread
![]() You are correct, LTD can (and often does) refuse benefits even if a person is collecting SSDI, as they each use their own criteria when deciding a claim. They are supposed to factor in the weight/credibility of a favorable SSDI decision when deciding claims, but rarely do. I've been on SSDI and LTD for many years now, my problem is that as soon as my dependent aged out from collecting off my SSD record (which in turn means the LTD carrier now has to pay much more) the carrier suddenly decides to cut me off regardless that my health situation is much worse than when I went on claim years ago, as well as very medically documented. Of course they deny the increase in benefit amount has anything to do with the denial which is common for them to do. I've been through appeals (always successful and benefits reinstated) in the past always over some BS reason to cut me off, having done so, this time I'm no longer letting their delay tactics work and I'm currently in the process of a lawsuit in order to have benefits reinstated. The appeal process is just something I no longer have any energy for, that's why my attorney is handling the matter for me. It's a long story and one I can't get into due to my filing, but I will never let them win as that's what they are hoping for. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question about 6 question cdr form | Social Security Disability | |||
a question -- | Gluten Sensitivity / Celiac Disease | |||
KD, a question for you! | Community & Forum Feedback | |||
I have a question | Computers and Technology |