FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
The Stumble Inn The place for social chat for our M.S. community. |
Closed Thread |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-29-2009, 06:51 PM | #11 | |||
|
||||
In Remembrance
|
I like that word. Demorepublicrat... I wonder if it's on wikipedia.
Yeah, Cindy said it right. Everyone has his/her price. I wouldn't trust him any further than I can throw him after his comments he made a couple weeks ago (and I rarely hear political comments unless they're made during a hockey playoff game). Demorepublicrat... hee hee! Maybe that's me! I couldn't care less about abortion and am passionately for stem cell research, but rampant government spending and control? Uh-uh. I wish we had more non US members here - they could tell you what national health care is all about. And where alot of that money comes from (think $7/gal gasoline for one...). My only and last technically political statement on this web site. Bed time!. Tom |
|||
04-29-2009, 08:10 PM | #12 | ||
|
|||
n/a
|
I would think that he knew he was going to lose the Republican primary - and now is a good time to go back to being a Democrat - which is how he statred out I believe - the man - in my opinion - is self-righteous scum and along with my two Senators from Maine -not in touch with those who elected them - as Rebublicans !!!!!!
|
||
"Thanks for this!" says: | Dejibo (04-30-2009) |
04-29-2009, 08:10 PM | #13 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
I'm not sure where I stand on the Specter thing yet but it's far from an isolated incident. If anyone is interested, here is a list of politicians who have switched parties:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_s..._United_States |
||
"Thanks for this!" says: |
04-29-2009, 10:33 PM | #14 | ||
|
|||
n/a
|
And guess who tried to get a bill passed that would not allow Senators to switch political parties after they were elected - you guessed it - Arlen Specter
|
||
04-29-2009, 11:56 PM | #15 | |||
|
||||
In Remembrance
|
Quote:
I'd like to give him the ole Christian benefit of the doubt, but I dunno.. How's that for a non religious-political statement?
__________________
~Love, Sally . "The best way out is always through". Robert Frost ~If The World Didn't Suck, We Would All Fall Off~ |
|||
"Thanks for this!" says: | AfterMyNap (04-30-2009), Dejibo (04-30-2009) |
04-30-2009, 12:19 AM | #16 | |||
|
||||
Co-Administrator
Community Support Team
|
I think there should be a legitimate party for those middle of the road politicians and voters.
I call it compromise.... but I don't care for labels too much anyhoo
__________________
Search NT - . |
|||
04-30-2009, 12:44 AM | #17 | |||
|
||||
Member
|
Quote:
All I ever wanted of the guy was that he act as a fiscal conservative. He had a chance to force the spendulus bill to wait until people could actually read it before they voted on it. That should be the BARE MINIMUM that ANY piece of legislation should go through, much less THE most expensive piece of legislation ever passed by congress. Obama had no plans to sign it until tuesday...so why did it HAVE to be passed the thursday before? So what is it about asking that a republican senator actually follow at least a couple of the republican party platform planks that is so bad? He could have held all kinds of moderate to liberal positions and kept his seat (see John McCain...we ran him for president for crying out loud, and look where that got us), but you can't hold all those contrary positions AND be a tax and spend liberal and still call yourself a republican. If you one by one renounce all of the positions in the republican party platform, including the biggest and oldest plank (fiscal conservatism), on what basis do you say "the party moved away from me"? He was a social moderate/liberal for a long time and enjoyed the support of the party bigs. He only lost that support when he gave up his last shred of fiscal conservatism. And no, it wasn't a stimulus package, it was spending for spendings sake with no regard for where the money ended up or how fast it would affect the economy. A huge percentage of the bill's money won't be spent until 2011 and 2012. How is that supposed to "stimulate" the down economy? Obama's own projections show the economy fully recovered by then. So why do we need to spend more than half a trillion dollars in 2011 and 2012 to stimulate an economy that is supposed to already be recovered? It couldn't have anything to do with getting re-elected could it? I respect your opinions Aarcyn, but I think you need to go back and check what happened with that bill. Specter was in the cat bird seat and could have demanded fiscal responsibility, and he didn't. He was the vote they needed and could have gotten anything he wanted, but he was fine with spending a trillion dollars on a democratic party wish list of spending. He was in no danger from "social conservatives" in 2010. The only reason he got into trouble was he abandoned fiscal conservatism. As for whether he is pond scum, I don't know the guy personally. All I know is that he has stated very publically and very clearly MANY times over the past couple of years how opposed he was to politicians switching parties after being elected by one party and how important he believes the ability of the minority party to filibuster is. He also stated as recently as a few weeks ago that he would not switch parties. Yet when his round behind is about to be tossed out of office next election, suddenly he sees nothing wrong with the practice? C'mon, give me a break! You obviously like the guy, and if so, I have no problem with that...but at least be honest about what he is doing. The GOP ran a very moderate republican VERY much like Specter for president less than 6 months ago. So how can he say the party has gone far right and left him? He left us behind in his quest to be the deal-maker with Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. This switch was political expediency for him and nothing else. |
|||
"Thanks for this!" says: |
04-30-2009, 01:12 AM | #18 | |||
|
||||
Co-Administrator
Community Support Team
|
I'm locking this thread for the night.
It looks like this is beginning to get a bit personal and possibly too political for the main NT forums. { Limited political discussions per the guidelines, more info /guidelines link below} You can participate in further discussions in the Social Groups - Or make a group of your own. Current Political Events http://neurotalk.psychcentral.com/group.php?groupid=10 [Inappropriate Content This is, first and foremost, a self-help support and education community. That means if your message (post or PM) isn't about offering support or information to another person or asking for it, it's potentially not appropriate for our community. Specifically prohibited from our community: * Advertisements of any sort * Flames or messages meant to intimidate or harass others * Threatening or profane messages * Messages discussing a private message (PM) from others * All administrative issues (exceptions will be made from time-to-time for community administrative issues) * Copyrighted materials that you do not own the rights to, except any educational or research article a member would like to post that is not available elsewhere online to nonsubscribers * Messages containing suicidal threats or threats of suicidal actions. Posts of a primarily suicidal nature should be made to the SOS forum. * Messages containing or condoning illegal acts * Triggering material without the use of the Trigger Icon * Anything that violates the Terms of Use for this site - Limit your direct discussion of politics, as people usually hold pretty strong opinions about this topic. Use the Politics Icon when posting a political thread.] http://neurotalk.psychcentral.com/post10285-1.html
__________________
Search NT - . |
|||
Closed Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Republican Sen. Arlen Specter To Switch Parties | Parkinson's Disease | |||
Phil Spector Guilty | The Stumble Inn |