FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Vitamins, Nutrients, Herbs and Supplements For discussion about vitamins, vitamin deficiency, herbal remedies and other supplements. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Wisest Elder Ever
|
This subject is very important.
Because information on this subject is very conflicting, readers here should read this information I've collected carefully and discuss with your doctor the best way to approach your cholesterol or elevated lipid problems before doing things yourself. Some of the sites I will be posting may have high doses of some supplements. I don't recommend really high anything, so if you choose to do~~ for example very high dose Vit C or anything else...~~you should be monitored by a doctor. The main drugs we have today for cholesterol issues have large tradeoffs.(serious side effects). So benefit vs risk is an important issue to consider if your doctor wants you to use statins. Also, be aware than many doctors do NOT understand statin side effects clearly. This is because they may only listen to drug salespeople and not research for themselves, or take their patients' complaints seriously. If your doctor does not listen to YOU, consider getting another doctor. This subject comes up on the various boards here often, and it is difficult to keep all the information more easily accessible. I've just purchased Dr. Jay Cohen MD's book on statins. It is a very interesting read. I am starting this thread today, so people can come on here and give their experiences with alternative cholesterol issues. And as time is showing the actual role of cholesterol is not as big as was once thought. Oxidation of LDL and inflammatory markers such as homocysteine and C-reactive protein, seem more instrumental in causing damage to the cardiovascular system. So I will be building this thread slowly. Please contribute your experiences as well. The medical tide now is turning, concerning statins and cholesterol. This first post will be a link fest... for patients who want to see the most recent opinions on this subject: Dr. Jay Cohen, MD http://www.medicationsense.com/index.html http://www.medicationsense.com/statin_drugs_book.html Dr. Graveline MD has a good website too: http://www.spacedoc.net/ And of course, The Cholesterol Myth: http://www.ravnskov.nu/cholesterol.htm Many people choose to use alternative supplements for cholesterol lowering. I'll be adding information about them in the future. This subject is HUGE, and Big DOLLARS are involved for the drug companies. So in a sense there is a political motivation to make as much money as possible. The direction of research is now moving away from statins. There are only two left on patent, and these will be expired soon. So we already see new commercials on TV and an increase in media coverage. But the truth is that no new statins are in the pipeline at this time. And the research is showing that endothelial inflammation of the blood vessels is the real culprit in cardiovascular disease. So some of the interventions for this problem are moving toward reducing this inflammation. That is where supplements come in. Some exciting new papers are appearing on curcumin and resveratrol (from red wine) as being very helpful. Statins have alarming side effects, with new ones showing up as time passes. Pulmonary fibrosis is recently linked to them. But also they have shown to be causes of peripheral neuropathy, loss of cognition and memory, serious elevations in liver function, and cancer in lab animals. One common effect of statins is their negative effects on the mitochondria of your cells. Statins seem to damage them, and hence the cell can no longer function normally to provide energy. So readers here, will have to return to this thread, and see what is being posted. All are welcome to ask questions and provide their experiences with this health problem. This is a huge subject, so there will be alot of homework for readers to do here. There is just no way to make this topic quick and easy! Here are some posts that already have had discussions here on statins/cholesterol: http://neurotalk.psychcentral.com/thread33964.html http://neurotalk.psychcentral.com/thread38209.html http://neurotalk.psychcentral.com/sh...hlight=Lipitor http://neurotalk.psychcentral.com/thread59339.html Our Parkinson's forum often has interesting information on statins, as they relate to Parkinson's disease. Here is a link to the search there on the word "statin": http://neurotalk.psychcentral.com/se...g_searchinfo=1 And a similar search on Peripheral Neuropathy. We get many visitors who have had negative side effects/nerve damage from statins: http://neurotalk.psychcentral.com/se...g_searchinfo=1
__________________
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-- Galileo Galilei ************************************ . Weezie looking at petunias 8.25.2017 **************************** These forums are for mutual support and information sharing only. The forums are not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider. Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.
Last edited by mrsD; 12-13-2008 at 01:44 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
"Thanks for this!" says: | froglady (12-18-2008), Jomar (12-18-2008), judymoody (12-13-2008), Koala77 (12-19-2008), Vowel Lady (12-15-2008) |
![]() |
#2 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
mrs d tried to start new thread, site wouldnt let me....so...any known relationship between statins and cardiomyopathy? dont know if it is hypertrophic or dialated....my sister was just dx and also has LBBB, and only a 30% EJ fraction....asked doc about activity restrictions, and was told no, which surprises me......no known heart attack, no hptn and seemed to tolerate the statin.....our mother had a "threatened/aborted heart attack and did have hypertension....didnt tolerate statins until i started her on Co Q10,
i am concerned .....any info you could provide would be appreciated.... tia |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
Wisest Elder Ever
|
Your question illustrates the confusion out there about statins.
On the one hand...studies show anti-inflammatory effects of statins that are independent of their cholesterol lowering actions. It is this anti-inflammatory effect that is supposed to be the "heart" of their success in studies. Many many studies are on PubMed about this subject. But I don't know how accurate they are. I recall a similar blitz of positive studies with hormone replacement therapy that were all erroneous, as well as antidepressants use in children that were positive and then withdrawn. (drug companies forced to reveal the negative studies). So it is really hard to know who to believe these days. If you Google this subject you will find doctors who claim that there is an "epidemic" of heart failure now and they believe it is from statin use-- like this example: Quote:
We do know that statins DAMAGE mitochondria. And since the heart is the most active muscle in the body, it is only logical that damage here would be signficant and deadly. Quote:
In Dr. Jay Cohen's book, he has many many reports from older patients who saw lowered cholesterol without damage in doses quite low. 2.5mg of Lipitor, 10mg Pravachol, 5 mg of Zocor. He believes that statins may help without harming people if used in much lower doses. That the high doses we are suggested to use are not accurate or necessary. Personally I think it is possible. I have seen patients coming to me in their 40's with CHF...and before statins, that was pretty rare. When the patents run out on statins soon, that is when the NEGATIVE studies will appear. That is the way other drugs' problems are eventually revealed and the truth then comes out.
__________________
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-- Galileo Galilei ************************************ . Weezie looking at petunias 8.25.2017 **************************** These forums are for mutual support and information sharing only. The forums are not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider. Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.
Last edited by mrsD; 12-13-2008 at 01:48 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
thanks.....my mom had the muscle issue with the statins...so it would seem reasonable that my sister might as well,,just not all the muscles ...
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
sent you an email...inre: townsend letter article from 2006
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
"Thanks for this!" says: | mrsD (12-15-2008) |
![]() |
#6 | |||
|
||||
Wisest Elder Ever
|
By far this is the best known, and most used alternative supplement for cholesterol issues.
Historically red yeast rice has been used for centuries in China for cardiovascular problems. When the first statin appeared in US...Mevacor by Merck, there was a huge push to remove competitive products like red yeast rice so that Mevacor would have a clear path medically. This was similar to what happened with l-tryptophan. The company who made a very high quality product Cholestin, was forced by the courts to change its product and remove red yeast rice. This is the new product: http://www.pharmanex.com/corp/produc...holestin.shtml However, interest in red yeast rice did not wane. And today it is back (like l-tryptophan as well). I've been reading about red yeast rice for years. No one single reference gives all the details about it. So far I see 3 major things one should be aware of in choosing to try red yeast rice: 1) Where does this red yeast rice come from? Most comes from China but there are companies here in US who make it too. Given the problems lately with China and adulteration, choosing a US produced form may be safer. Two that I know use US product are the NOW company, and Doctor's Best. They openly state this. I am not going to research all of the suppliers out there, so if you decide to use red yeast rice, I'd strongly suggest you contact the company you intend to use yourself. 2) Not all suppliers have a standarized amount of red yeast rice in them. They all vary. Consumerlab tested some, and found: http://www.consumerlab.com/reviews/R...ed_Yeast_Rice/ http://uk.reuters.com/article/health...97022820080709 http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs...ournalCode=acm
__________________
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-- Galileo Galilei ************************************ . Weezie looking at petunias 8.25.2017 **************************** These forums are for mutual support and information sharing only. The forums are not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider. Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
Wisest Elder Ever
|
By far this is the best known, and most used alternative supplement for cholesterol issues.
Historically red yeast rice has been used for centuries in China for cardiovascular problems. When the first statin appeared in US...Mevacor by Merck, there was a huge push to remove competitive products like red yeast rice so that Mevacor would have a clear path medically. This was similar to what happened with l-tryptophan. The company who made a very high quality product Cholestin, was forced by the courts to change its product and remove red yeast rice. This is the new product: http://www.pharmanex.com/corp/produc...holestin.shtml However, interest in red yeast rice did not wane. And today it is back (like l-tryptophan as well). I've been reading about red yeast rice for years. No one single reference gives all the details about it. So far I see 3 major things one should be aware of in choosing to try red yeast rice: 1) Where does this red yeast rice come from? Most comes from China but there are companies here in US who make it too. Given the problems lately with China and adulteration, choosing a US produced form may be safer. Two that I know use US product are the NOW company, and Doctor's Best. They openly state this. I am not going to research all of the suppliers out there, so if you decide to use red yeast rice, I'd strongly suggest you contact the company you intend to use yourself. 2) Not all suppliers have a standarized amount of red yeast rice in them. They all vary. Consumerlab tested some, and found: http://www.consumerlab.com/reviews/R...ed_Yeast_Rice/ http://uk.reuters.com/article/health...97022820080709 http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs...ournalCode=acm 3) There is a contaminant called citrinin that can be present in some red yeast rice extracts. Quality manufacturers state clearly that their product does not contain this contaminant: NOW and Doctor's Best are examples. Quote:
Here are two links with good information about this herb: http://www.umm.edu/altmed/articles/red-yeast-000323.htm This one goes into a huge drug interaction paragraph which seems rather common to many that are available on the net..some may not really be applicable to red yeast rice but they are included for safety reasons: http://www.intelihealth.com/IH/ihtIH...l?d=dmtContent I have seen one paper of one case of interaction with the antibiotic Biaxin. So the standard warnings for use with Zithromax, erythromycin, antifungals, Biaxin etc (the same warnings for the old Seldane) apply. I don't think patients should take red yeast rice should do so without a doctor's supervision. You need to monitor liver functions (it is rare to have this effect on the liver but it should be monitored anyway). Dr. Jay Cohen suggests in his book, that mild to moderately elevated patients may see good lowering of cholesterol. Also he suggests that C-reactive protein may lower as well. Here is a recent paper from 2008 with results: Quote:
http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/69/2/231 And this: http://www.creators.com/lifestylefea...ol-levels.html Dosing... To start, I'd go carefully. Start at 600mg twice a day. Do this for 3 months and get retested. If this works, you don't need to go higher. Many of the medical sites I found suggest 1200mg twice a day. If you use a quality product, going higher is probably not necessary. If you get NO improvements you may have to start a statin at very low doses and titrate up further with that if you choose. There are not many reports of side effects. I found one at PubMed: Quote:
__________________
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-- Galileo Galilei ************************************ . Weezie looking at petunias 8.25.2017 **************************** These forums are for mutual support and information sharing only. The forums are not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider. Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.
Last edited by mrsD; 12-15-2008 at 02:54 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|