| FAQ/Help |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
11-19-2008, 08:02 PM
|
#12 | |||
|
||||
|
Grand Magnate
|
I'm just trying to figure out what this means to the vets now . . . are you saying that before now, they didn't cover these illnesses; like MS and Cancer (no matter what the "cause")?
My friend, who is a US vet, was medically retired with MS. He thinks it was caused by uranium while in this latest war (came home in 2004, I think), but he has been getting a medical pension just because of the MS (regardless of the cause). With this ruling, are they going to be entitled to more now, or ... what is the actual benefit? Cherie
__________________
I am not a Neurologist, Physician, Nurse, or Hairdresser ... but I have learned that it is not such a great idea to give oneself a haircut after three margaritas
. |
|||
|
 Reply With Quote
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The Mystery of Gulf War Syndrome | ALS News & Research | |||
| Persian Gulf War syndrome firmly linked to chemical exposure | ALS News & Research | |||
| Vets urge more action on Gulf War syndrome | ALS News & Research | |||
| Study: Gulf War syndrome doesn't exist | General Health Conditions & Rare Disorders | |||
| Government-funded report dismisses idea of Gulf War syndrome | ALS News & Research | |||
Threaded Mode