FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
|
|||
Magnate
|
Love ya anyhoo.
Key issue is that docs often change their minds! And I guess they should be allowed to? But for me, as long as they continue the initial therapies and maintain them, and they work/help. Who cares? IF ONE diagnoses gets me treatments that work, and the neuro 'feels' on a subsequent appointment it mite be 'something different' in terms of diagnosis? At least, he's got a 'record' of his considerations? I KNOW I GOT SOMETHING, Just what, is still ultimately TBD? But I respond to the qualifying testing for one therapy which works. But, that doesn't mean I have exclusively that or something else or both. FINDING A DIAGNOSIS should not be the end all and be all of the process? FINDING TREATMENTS THAT WORK ARE. Truly wish it were easier said than done tho. ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Ya got that right !
__________________
Bob B |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
If anyone doubts the FDA... | Parkinson's Disease | |||
A harsh read, but clarifying in some ways | Parkinson's Disease | |||
headaches and some issues need clarifying | Traumatic Brain Injury and Post Concussion Syndrome |