Traumatic Brain Injury and Post Concussion Syndrome For traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post concussion syndrome (PCS).


advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-23-2008, 11:53 PM #1
Lucy Lucy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 317
15 yr Member
Lucy Lucy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 317
15 yr Member
Default

Too true - I am sure that 99% MRI are fine - just make sure you are sedated first.

Seiko I haven't reported my unpleasant MRI to anybody aside from the insurer who insisted that I had it. Also told my GP to make sure that he tells anybody who needs one with a head injury to be prepared for very very loud noise - instead of being like me thinking that I was going to be going back to work afterwards. After all C/Ts are noise and pain free.

Lynlee
Lucy is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 07:11 AM #2
seiko seiko is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 68
15 yr Member
seiko seiko is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 68
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucy View Post
Too true - I am sure that 99% MRI are fine - just make sure you are sedated first.

Seiko I haven't reported my unpleasant MRI to anybody aside from the insurer who insisted that I had it. Also told my GP to make sure that he tells anybody who needs one with a head injury to be prepared for very very loud noise - instead of being like me thinking that I was going to be going back to work afterwards. After all C/Ts are noise and pain free.

Lynlee
Hi Lynlee:
Here is an interesting data:
"in a poll of 105 organizations participating in a dial in seminar organized by a non profit health service research firm(ECRI) in September found nearly 60 percent have had MRI "incidents" including projectiles, burns, interference with implants. Most such incidents are not reported to food and drug administration, because reporting is voluntary and varies.(nuclear medicine news NOV 13, 2005)

We really do not clear picture of incidents in regard to MRI as they do not all get reported.
It is so important to report all incidents.

I did extensive research on what to expect from my MRI before the procedure, so the noise was expected.

I would like to know if there are any laws out there which says when a patient press the distress call... respond to them immediately???

Well, I called our state health department, and there are no set laws in regard to response time and patients distress call.
The MRI facility that I went to was did not part of the hospital, so it was up to the facility's discretion what safety measures they implement.

Last edited by seiko; 11-24-2008 at 07:36 PM. Reason: add
seiko is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 09:12 AM #3
seiko seiko is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 68
15 yr Member
seiko seiko is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 68
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seiko View Post
Hi Lynlee:
Here is an interesting data:
"in a poll of 105 organizations participating in a dial in seminar organized by a non profit health service research firm(ECRI) in September found nearly 60 percent have had MRI "incidents" including projectiles, burns, interference with implants. Most such incidents are not reported to food and drug administration, because reporting is voluntary and varies.(nuclear medicine news NOV 13, 2005)

We really do not clear picture of incidents in regard to MRI as they do not all get reported.
It is so important to report all incidents.

I did extensive research on what to expect from my MRI before the procedure, so the noise was expected.

I would like to know if there are any laws out there which says when a patient press the distress call... respond to them immediately???
(I called my state health department and there are no set laws in regard to response time for patients distress call, the MRI facility that I went to operates like a doctor's office so they are self regulated)
seiko is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 10:22 AM #4
seiko seiko is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 68
15 yr Member
seiko seiko is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 68
15 yr Member
Default

same as above

Last edited by seiko; 11-25-2008 at 09:14 AM. Reason: same as above
seiko is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 08:13 AM #5
vini's Avatar
vini vini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: some were over the rainbow
Posts: 552
15 yr Member
vini vini is offline
Member
vini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: some were over the rainbow
Posts: 552
15 yr Member
Default ct scan

hi

one CT scan is equal to 3 years background radiation but if we need to have them done what other options do we have
__________________
the light connects the many stars, and through the web they think as one, like god the universe we learn about our self's, the light and warmth connect us, the distance & darkness keep us apart
.
vini
.
vini is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 10:42 AM #6
seiko seiko is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 68
15 yr Member
seiko seiko is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 68
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vini View Post
hi

one CT scan is equal to 3 years background radiation but if we need to have them done what other options do we have
Hi vini, I think it is safe to say that most of us are aware of effect of too much radiation on the body.But how many of us are aware of effect of too much radio frequency on the body?? ......
seiko is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 08:44 AM #7
seiko seiko is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 68
15 yr Member
seiko seiko is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 68
15 yr Member
Default I have yet to find a single article on..

I have yet to find a single article on the effect of too much radio frequency on the body.

If radio frequency is so safe why does FDA has limits on it?

and if it is not, why do incidents of overexposure are still happening??

What is being done to prevent human error?

Covering incidents by lack of information is no longer acceptable.
seiko is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Tags
post concusion syndrome


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What I've learned... noname Thoracic Outlet Syndrome 1 05-19-2016 12:23 AM
I've learned Alffe Survivors of Suicide 11 02-04-2013 06:36 AM
Medicare Part D...what is your experience for Part D? Stitcher Parkinson's Disease 5 04-04-2008 12:14 PM
Part 2...Medicare Part D/Prescription Coverage Stitcher Parkinson's Disease 1 12-17-2006 12:50 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.