| FAQ/Help |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
01-23-2010, 09:41 AM
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
Wisest Elder Ever
|
I question how a Neurologist can even make that assumption (copaxone failure) when the drug only has a 30% chance of delaying progression. That's a pretty low number.
Plus, it's not the number of lesions you have....it's where they're located that matters. I am getting pretty disgusted at the Neurologists and big pharma who have a financial stake in the approval of MS treatments. It's almost like they don't want us to ever be "totally OK"......because that would mean a loss of revenue for them. 
__________________
These forums are for mutual support and information sharing only. The forums are not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider. Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here. |
|||
|
 Reply With Quote
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Question about Copaxone | Multiple Sclerosis | |||
| Copaxone | Multiple Sclerosis | |||
| Copaxone...would this be an IPIR? | Multiple Sclerosis | |||
| Copaxone | Multiple Sclerosis | |||
| Looks like I will be trying copaxone again | Multiple Sclerosis | |||
Threaded Mode