Community & Forum Feedback Discuss ideas and offer feedback about our community here. It's a also a place to ask any questions you may have about the community itself.
Our Community Guidelines.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2006, 12:59 PM #1
kimmydawn's Avatar
kimmydawn kimmydawn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,455
15 yr Member
kimmydawn kimmydawn is offline
Senior Member
kimmydawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,455
15 yr Member
Default

I would like to finish by saying...

I think that detail of this nature -- when it's involving another member's actions -- should be taken to PM. I'm not saying this because I think things should be hidden, or not addressed...to the contrary. I feel that those who have concerns should have answers. However, when it's about another member, it might not always feel so good for them to have issues posted about publicly. In fact, it could feel upsetting and/or hurtful.

I'm not saying that's the case in this instance. I am saying that I've seen it happen...more than a few times.

KD
__________________
<center>
.

From the caterpillar emerged
~Strong in flight, beautiful to the eyes, movement laced with grace~
The butterfly
**KD**
</center>
kimmydawn is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 01:18 PM #2
glenntaj glenntaj is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,857
15 yr Member
glenntaj glenntaj is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,857
15 yr Member
Default And, as should be evident--

--in comparing these two instances, context is everything.

Of course, one person's acceptable content is another person's unacceptable content. Personally, beyond the "self-policing" aspects that KimmyDawn mentions, I much prefer to err on the side of content inclusiveness.

Last edited by glenntaj; 10-05-2006 at 04:19 PM.
glenntaj is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 01:24 PM #3
kimmydawn's Avatar
kimmydawn kimmydawn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,455
15 yr Member
kimmydawn kimmydawn is offline
Senior Member
kimmydawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,455
15 yr Member
Default

That's a good point and thank you for reminding me that I wanted to state that I'm working on getting clarification for the terms used in the TOU and the applicable guideline (i.e. sexual oriented, obscene, vulgar and profane).

I think that so much of this issue does come down to personal preference, what one considers acceptable, or many other things that form our opinions of this discussion. Because of that, clarification and understanding of those terms in relation to the expectations of discussion for this site is needed.

Thanks!

KD
__________________
<center>
.

From the caterpillar emerged
~Strong in flight, beautiful to the eyes, movement laced with grace~
The butterfly
**KD**
</center>
kimmydawn is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 04:08 PM #4
DocJohn's Avatar
DocJohn DocJohn is offline
Administrator
Community Support Team
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 41,778
15 yr Member
DocJohn DocJohn is offline
Administrator
Community Support Team
DocJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 41,778
15 yr Member
Default

Sexual discussion is fine in context. If people with sexual disorders are discussing said sexual disorders, that's fine. If people are having a frank discussion about difficulty with sexual performance in a thread so-labeled, that's fine. If people are turning an otherwise serious thread into one big sexual innuendo, that's not fine. The key here is context.

Sexual content is fine when it's related to a health issue or some other issue covered by this community. But when you have a choice about being explicit or subtle, I might suggest it will sit better if a person is more subtle in their descriptions and such.

We're all adults here. As long as the thread is labeled as talking about sex, that will allow others to avoid the thread if they are easily upset by such discussions. (Which is a good reminder, too, for ensuring you pick subject lines that mean something, and don't take other people's threads into different topic areas they never intended...)

John
__________________
Founder & Your Host, NeuroTalk
(Feel free to PM me if you need anything)
DocJohn is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 10:37 PM #5
mister mister is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 50
15 yr Member
mister mister is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 50
15 yr Member
Default Rocking, Kim and Doc

Thank you sll so much for dealing with things in a personal and professional manner and asking that issues be brought to you attention personally before a judgement is made regarding whether it may be appropriate. That is the kind of thing that should be standard operating procedure in any forum such as this.

Thanks again for all you do
Mister
mister is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.